On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 08:37, Post, Mark K wrote:
> It isn't that xip2fs isn't acceptable to the kernel maintainers (although it
> will never be part of 2.4, since it is new function and not maintenance).
> That is being worked on, evidently.  It's just that xip2fs isn't posted on
> the IBM developerWorks site, but is on linuxvm.org.  That's because it
> didn't/won't go through the (overly) official process to get IBM approval
> for release.

Thanks.  That makes it much more clear.

Adam

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to