Hello,
I sent a note before, but I don't know if my messages are blocked. I have a 
very simmilar situation:
- z/VM 5.1 (4G real, 2G expanded)
- Guest Linux SuSE 8 with Oracle 10g. Definition of 2G and SGA 1.7G (I know is 
big, but it's the one with better results)
- zSeries 800 with 2 IFL
If I have this storage in the guest, I have CPU at 100%. If I decrease storage 
in the guest (and reduce SGA), it increases access to dasd, and bad response 
time.
Any help is welcome.
---Mensaje original---thanx 

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Glenn Nicholas
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:05 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Oracle 10G POOR performance

Melissa, if you have a DBA, they can analyse what the 3 queries are
doing. Indexes could be missing, the optimiser could be using a
different approach. Your DBA should be aware of session tracing, if not,
here is an overview:
http://dbasupport.com/oracle/ora10g/session_tracing601.shtml

On 27/07/2005, at 9:37 PM, Perry, Melissa wrote:

> Running on V960 w/ escon from STK.. Depending on DBA for monitoring
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Rich Smrcina
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:22 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Oracle 10G POOR performance
>
> What kind of processor and DASD? Do you have any monitoring tools?
>
> Perry, Melissa wrote:
>
>> Looking to take the easy way out by just asking question. We are 
>> running Z/vm 5.1, Suse 8, and Oracle 10G....Just starting to test
>> performance......3 oracle queries will bring the IFL to 100%--the IFL

>> seems to take all of the expanded storage we give it. The Linux 
>> guest
>>
>
>
>> is 750M.
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have no oracle knowledge....the oracle people are 
>> just saying performance is awful.....They are currently running 
>> Oracle
>>
>
>
>> 8 in production on a Risc 7025 with 2 335 M processors and kind of 
>> getting by. It seems there must be something is very wrong over on
>>
> the IFL. I
>
>> am leaning more toward Oracle. Any suggestions?
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

>> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or 
>> visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>>
>>
>
> --
> Rich Smrcina
> VM Assist, Inc.
> Main: (262)392-2026
> Cell: (414)491-6001
> Ans Service: (360)715-2467
> rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
>
> Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
> WAVV 2006 - Chattanooga, TN - April 7-11, 2006
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or 
> visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or 
> visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


http://webmail.wanadoo.es. Tu correo gratuito, rápido y en español

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to