Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 13:28 -0400, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 10/26/2006 at 09:52 AST, Richard Troth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note the existence of "bogo" in the word -- for bogus.
It's a useless number.
He says, as if MIPS were not also a useless number. :-)
(yawn...scratch..scratch) So, I'm curious. Does that mean "bogomips"
has, like, O(n**2) level of bogocity? Kul.
After the BogoMips number has entertained us once again I'm inclined to
"fix" this stupid number. The only place where we use the result of the
Gah! What will future generations do to entertain themselves?
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
Please do not reply off-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
