I must have missed during the installation where I could choose between
the two methods. Oh well, I've corrected it on my master image so new
clones should be fine.

I guess in my case, I had a bump on my head from hitting myself with a
hammer, Doctor. All better now.  :-)

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 1:51 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Waiting for device
/dev/disk/by-id/ccw-IBM.75000000029391.070e.46-part1 to appear:

>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at  4:28 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Stricklin, Raymond J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
-snip-
> The mount-by-id vs. mount-by-device is a selection during filesystem
> setup at install time. I also have consistently seen mount-by-device
as
> the default over several dozen installs and have never had to change
it
> as this is the behavior I wanted.

Ok, so mount-by-id for people that are planning on doing cloning later
on is another example of "Doctor, it hurts when I do this."

> Is it possible that mount-by-id becomes the default if you are
> installing to FCP disks?

I don't have any FCP to play with, so I can't answer that myself.


Mark Post

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to