On Monday, 01/14/2008 at 05:43 EST, Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was the problem the OP was having. Since the LPAR was defined as being an > "MVS LPAR" (BTW, why should PR/SM care what OS is to be run in the LPAR?), HCD > would not allow him to configure the FCP I/O devices onto the LPAR. He had to > either create a new LPAR definition, saying it was a "VM LPAR" or delete and > redefine the existing one. PR/SM doesn't care. IOCP doesn't care. HCD cares, wanting to ensure that you create a valid IODF for z/OS. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
