Of course. Tom
>>> Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/2/2008 3:14 PM >>> On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: > I currently have 4 images running. When they are completely idle, > the IFL runs at 12%. That is 3% per idle Oracle image. When I take > down the 4 images, we idle under 1%. That would seem to me that > about 30 idling Oracle images will drive an IFL (z/890 flavor of > IFL) near capacity. Hence running lots of images, just because you > can, may not be a good choice. And maintaining 30 copies, disk, > backups, etc, just to avoid performance tuning... I don't know. Is > the economics such that, that is better? I think I could argue the > issue either way, until we start loading this up. You DO have the no-timer patch turned on, right? Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
