>>> On 8/27/2008 at 11:02 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Rohling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SUSE tends to be more 'bleeding edge' and RH tends to be more > 'stable' (please - no flame wars on that - it's just my impression that RH > is very focused on stability - more so than SUSE).
Having seen what goes on from the inside for the last 18 months, I can confidently say that you're incorrect about that. After all, it was SUSE that invented the concept of an enterprise Linux distribution. Novell/SUSE isn't so crazy as to commit to supporting things for seven years, and then not be extremely concerned about product stability. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390