Barton Robinson wrote:
So you should probably measure the two before deciding on which one you want to keep. CMM-1 has very positive results, cmma not so positive.
At the risk of bringing on the wrath of the performance gods, I just have to say that I'm not really interested in measuring whether CMMA is better then CMM-1. If the folks at IBM think that CMMA was worthwhile enough to implement, then I'll drink their Kool-Aid and be happy with it. Especially since CMMA is so much easier to manage...just turn the blasted thing on. And it just makes sense for the two OSes to "actively" communicate page states rather than the not-so-dynamic method of CMM-1. Leland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
