Where I did initially like IUCV and VCTCA, both methods are Point to Point on an IP network. (it seemed simplier) It violates all the standard networking laws.
Every time I showed our IP setup to the network people, they were just confused and I didn't know why. But in z/VM 5.2, support was dropped for IUCV and VCTCA on an IP network. When I migrated over to z/VM 5.2, I had lots of VSE and Linux images that had to be converted. But first, I had to learn real IP networking (subnets, broadcast address, router address, etc). I also converted over to VSWITCH which made life soo much easier. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> Mark Post <mp...@novell.com> 4/26/2010 3:54 PM >>> >>> On 4/26/2010 at 04:46 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazq...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: > On 04/26/2010 10:32 PM, Mark Post wrote: > >>>>> On 4/26/2010 at 04:19 PM, Michael MacIsaac <mike...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Ouch! We use IUCV all the time. Is there any reason for this? >> >> For the installation process? > > SuSE is not too far: > http://en.opensuse.org/Linuxrc#Special_parameters_for_S.2F390_and_zSeries Yes. So? Who is using this stuff for installation these days (except perhaps on Hercules)? If someone is, on real System z hardware, they're being overly masochistic to say the least. Don't do that. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390