Sebastian,
> So I still think it is sufficient to do:
> chccwdev -e xxx ;udevadm settle ;dasdfmt xxx
... which is somewhat the conclusion I came to with the previous test
script. So everyone wanting to script with chccwdev -e could write a
function such as:
function enableDevice { chccwdev -e $1; udevadm settle; }
and always call that function instead chccwdev -e. So my question is
still: "If a udevadm settle is always required after a chccwdev -e, then
why is it not just built into the command?"
"Mike MacIsaac" <mikemac at-sign us.ibm.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
