On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:44:44PM -0700, Mark Post wrote: > >>> On 2/12/2014 at 04:29 AM, Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > > > The reason for this is quite simple: the current 31 bit kernel was broken > > for nearly a year before somebody noticed. > > That's an interesting assertion, considering we build multiple 31-bit > kernels daily, if not multiple times a day. Or do you mean broken at > run time, not compile time?
I meant broken at run time (IPL time) in multiple ways. See http://marc.info/?t=139027067000004&r=1&w=2 as reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
