> I'm in support for both a 'Micky Mouse' (tm) style editor and a 'real'
one.
> (OK I like Vi - it's very powerfull once you know the commands, but it IS
> difficult to learn).
'vi' is powerful? I think it looks kind of like EDLIN. Must scare a lot of
people off, considering EDLIN's capabilities. I prefer editors like edit
(dos) and pico (linux). Most non-linux editors are "Micky Mouse" editors, as
you so degradingly name them. And, one last thing, I rarely use the mouse
function in text editors.
How is the ELKS API accessed in assembly? I think I'll need that if I'm
going to code one of those editors.
--
Thor Harald Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
