On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Perry Harrington wrote: > Why not take the approach that Linux takes with the module: > > Create the driver structure, have the primitives referenced in the > driver structure. If the driver doesn't implement a primitive, set > the structure member to NULL, and the driver loader will take care > to use the builtin function. EG: > > struct driver { > ptr_t hline > ptr_t vline > ptr_t bline > ... > } DRIVER; > > struct driver herc_card[]={ > herc_hline, > herc_vline, > NULL > }; > > That way you can have driver optimized primitives or rely on the default, > which just calls write_pixel. sounds good. how much would it take to change/add microwin? Jakob
- Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr
- Re: Microwindows for Hercules Jakob Eriksson
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Jakob Eriksson
- Re: Microwindows for Hercules Perry Harrington
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Jakob Eriksson
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Chipzz
- Re: Microwindows for Hercules Alan Cox
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr
- Re: Microwindows for Hercules Perry Harrington
- rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- Re: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Robert de Bath
- Re: rfs (new filesystem for ELKS) Beau Kuiper
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr
- RE: Microwindows for Hercules Greg Haerr