On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Stefan Pettersson wrote: > So we are back to the usual problem, where in the 640 kB should we put > or own EPROM. On x86 you've got 20 address lines, this is 0-1mb. What do you think the space is reserved for from 640k-1024k? ROMs. When the system boots, it will probe various address, in 2k blocks, from c800:0 to f400:0, looking for a ROM. So basically, stick your ROM anywhere in that range that isn't otherwise used. Davey
- RE: KISS networking for elks Stefan Pettersson
- Re: KISS networking for elks Christopher Kovacs
- RE: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.ac.uk Greg Haerr
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.ac.uk Alistair Riddoch
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.ac.uk Alistair Riddoch
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.ac.uk Thomas Stewart
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.ac.uk Alistair Riddoch
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.soton.a... Sam Steele
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs.sot... Stefan Pettersson
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs... John Galt
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs... David Murn
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ft... Stefan Pettersson
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available fro... Alistair Riddoch
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ftp.ecs... Blaz Antonic
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available from ft... David Murn
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available fro... Ken Yap
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available fro... Alistair Riddoch
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available fro... David Murn
- Re: ELKS 0.0.81 available fro... Riley Williams
- Linux on 486 without fdd/hdd Jitendra Kanitkar
- Re: Linux on 486 without fdd/... Alan Cox