I am using lm_sensors and haven't found any difference in reliability.
Mike
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 7:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: emddjf@office8
>Subject: Re: [LINUX-ABIT] Lockups and what to do...
>
>
>I also suspected lm_sensors as an instability factor. I stopped using
>them and my lockups went away. No guarantee that was it though as I
>was changing many variables at the time. I also suspected xntpd and
>stopped using it.
>
>Once I left my machine up for about 24 hours compiling the kernel in
>a loop using both processors (make -j 2). It didn't lock up.
>
>Dwayne
>
>> Lunar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I think every one who had lockups need to send a complete report
>>somewhere
>> > (buy date for the motherboard, speed and voltage of CPUs, average temp,
>>all
>> > devices, kernel, modules, ...) to track where it goes wrong.
>> >
>> > What do you think of that ?
>> > And who wants to do it ?
>> >
>> > Lunar
>> >
>> > PS : I bought my Abit last week, so I don't have enough time to really
>>test
>> > it...
>>
>> The bit about monitoring temperature reminds me of something... when I
>> installed lm_sensors, my machine locked up within 24 hrs after having
>> run for two weeks. After reboot, I didn't load the lm_sensors stuff
>> and have run for a week with no problems.
>>
>> Mine is 466@507x2 with interactive use only (no seti et al) and no
>> special cooling other than stock cpu fans and case fan.
>>
>> --Dave
>>
>> --
>> =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
>> =- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
>>
>
>--
>=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
>=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
