Quoting Roeland Th. Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > What could be going wrong? Why doesn't the 128MB + 64MB + 64MB thing work? > > a few things -- be sure you have quite some power supply. > -- be sure you have a rev 1.0 board or 1.1. board that's > patched > -- never ever overclock I don't know about the revision of the board, but the rest seems to be OK... Is there a special order to put the memory in? Does it matter what I put in the first bank? > also, a good thing is to run a known-good SMP version of linux. stock > kernels may not cut it too well. my 2.2.16 SuSE works fine. stock _will_ > fail witin a few minites to hours. Yes, but the system didn't even REACH that point of start-up :] It's really scary.. Regards, Sander. -- | It is better to regret something you HAVE done, | than to regret something you HAVEN'T done... | Cistron Internet: php/c/perl/html/c++/sed/awk/linux/sql/cgi/security -- =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -= =- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 128M = No Go?
Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker) Mon, 27 Nov 2000 02:31:15 -0800
- [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 128M = No Go? Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 128M ... Roeland Th. Jansen
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 1... Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M... Roeland Th. Jansen
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 128M ... Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] 64M + 64M + 1... Roeland Th. Jansen
