Linux-Advocacy Digest #224, Volume #33           Sat, 31 Mar 01 14:13:03 EST

Contents:
  Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
  Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
  Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Roger Perkins")
  Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Roger Perkins")
  Re: Communism ("Roger Perkins")
  Re: Here is the response from Microsoft regarding Linux and Piracy: ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: Communism ("Roger Perkins")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:21:31 -0500

Paul Holloway wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:57:29 -0800, GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> >"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
> >>
> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity.  Like you saying those
> >> : who believe in a different economic system should be shot?  Now that's real
> >> : "constitutional" of you, aaron.  You can't have it both ways -
> >> : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered ignorant
> >> : and a nazi by the adults here.
> >>
> >> Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> >> mostly correct.
> >>
> >> If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> >> country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> >> or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> >>
> >> Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> >> rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> >> felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> >>
> >> Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> >> held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> >> to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> >> entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> >>
> >> But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> >> our problems.  Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> >> they have much more power.
> >>
> >> Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> >> degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> >> and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> >> conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> >> masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> >> must be.
> >>
> >> Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst.  And given the threat
> >> that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> >> inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> >> necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> >>
> >> Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> >> the most blatantly and obviously guilty.  And, so long as these folks
> >> get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> >> somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> >> him.
> >>
> >> I don't want more bloodshed.  I think there's been too much already
> >> (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> >> other kinds too numerous to list).  But it is absolutely necessary
> >> that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> >> mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> >> actions of our so-called "government," be ended.  Hopefully, by the
> >> most peaceful means possible.
> >>
> >> I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> >> its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> >> whether domestic or foreign.  So have millions of others.  We are
> >> greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> >> political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> >> be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> >> form of government.
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> >Thank you!  Well put!
> >
> >--
> >V
> >
> 
> Hmmmmm, ya'll are living in a different USA than I am.  Maybe I took a
> wrong turn somewhere, I just don't see these multitudes of traitors
> strolling around everyday.

Really?  How about all of those congress-critters whose primary pursuit
is figuring out how to raise taxes so that the money can be funnelled
into the pockets of their favorite constituents (welfare parasites
and corporate parasites)?

The clause says "GENERAL welfare" not welfare.  PUBLIC ROADS constitute
general welfare.  AFDC, and WIC checks, and special tax breaks are
*NOT* ***GENERAL*** welfare...they are specific welfare for specific
individuals.  Same thing goes for Social Security.

And I don't give a damn how much you or anybody else "paid into it".
Anybody who supported the continuation and expansion of Social Security
was a fool buying into a Ponzi Scheme...and I for one, feel not the
slightest obligations to fulfill your childish "we can tax ourselves
into prosperity" dreams.

Fuck all of these people for stupidly trusting a class of people who,
since the dawn of time, have been known as pathalogical liars.

"The only distinctly American criminal class is Congress"
        -- Mark Twain.

> 
> "May you always have fair winds and following seas..."
> 
> Paul Holloway


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:35:17 -0500

Scott Erb wrote:
> 
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > Let's suppose for a moment, Roger, that you are not, in fact, a
> > fully indoctrinated Communist.
> >
> > If that is so...then I'm sure that you can specifically name a few
> > of the ways in which you fundamentally disagree with Communist philosophy.
> >
> > Accuracy counts, so be precise
> 

Actually, the question was posed to Roger Perkins, not you.


> That sounds like the McCarthy era hearings, putting the burden of proof
> on someone to prove that somehow they are not something.  You are the
> one who needs to be precise: what do you consider the "philosophy of
> communism" to be?

Let's use Marx and Engels' writings for starters.


>                    For me it would be: 1) no private property, the state
> owns and controls all means of production; 2) no democracy, as democracy
> is to communists a tool of bourgeious capitalists; rather, you need a
> vanguard party to guide society to utopia; 3) a fundamental belief that
> human nature, culture, and politics are all products of the economic
> mode of production, and 4) a belief that once you change the mode of
> production to a purely socialist system where the state has managed to
> push away capitalist ideas and has created a communist culture, then the
> state can whither away as the people, no longer poisoned by capitalist
> exploitation will cooperate.
> 
> Even though you didn't ask me, I certainly don't believe any of the
> four.  I've traveled a bit in Russia and know a lot of people there,
> communism Soviet style sucked.  I haven't seen any other poster profess
> any of these things.  So your question seems to be a distraction and
> obfuscation of a debate, and serves no purpose except to try to put
> yourself on the offensive.


Roger Perkins always finds some lame excuse to apologize for
Communist-based laws in the US.

He claims to be a patriotic American soldier, but he always finds some
excuse to promote a "I vas just vollowink orders" mentality.






-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: "Roger Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:10:46 -0800

That's because these anti-government guys think anyone who doesn't do what
they want them to do  are traitors.  My way or the highway attitude.  What
they are advocating is dictatorship, not an American government.

Roger
AIRBORNE!

"Paul Holloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:57:29 -0800, GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
> >>
> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roger Perkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> : Lets see... anti-constitutional subversive activity.  Like you saying
those
> >> : who believe in a different economic system should be shot?  Now
that's real
> >> : "constitutional" of you, aaron.  You can't have it both ways -
> >> : constitutionally and your way. And that is why you are considered
ignorant
> >> : and a nazi by the adults here.
> >>
> >> Actually, according to the U.S. Constitution and federal law, Aaron is
> >> mostly correct.
> >>
> >> If you're a U.S. Citizen, but choose to make war against your own
> >> country, or give aid and comfort to its very numerous enemies (foreign
> >> or domestic), then you're guilty of treason, a capital crime.
> >>
> >> Also, if you conspire to violate the Constitutionally guaranteed
> >> rights of any U.S. Citizen under color of law, you're guilty of a
> >> felony, which becomes a capital crime if loss of life results.
> >>
> >> Regarding the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), membership in it was once
> >> held to be illegal for this reason - not because you aren't entitled
> >> to hold and express any opinions you wish, but because you are not
> >> entitled to conspire to violate the rights of others.
> >>
> >> But right now the CPUSA, though obnoxious, is among the very least of
> >> our problems.  Both of the "mainstream" parties are much worse, since
> >> they have much more power.
> >>
> >> Both major parties advocate and practice socialism (in varying
> >> degrees), both have *knowingly* caused massive loss of life, liberty
> >> and property, which they were supposed to protect, and both have
> >> conspired, very successfully, to make this nation an oligarchy
> >> masquerading as a democracy, rather than the Republic that by law it
> >> must be.
> >>
> >> Hence, there are a LOT of traitors in our midst.  And given the threat
> >> that they pose to the life, liberty and property of all people (both
> >> inside the U.S. and elsewhere), I think it is not only reasonable, but
> >> necessary, that the worst of them be dealt with as the law requires.
> >>
> >> Aaron is not advocating that we round up everyone - just those who are
> >> the most blatantly and obviously guilty.  And, so long as these folks
> >> get an *exceedingly* fair trial, and as long as their sentences are
> >> somewhat commensurate with their crimes, I am in total agreement with
> >> him.
> >>
> >> I don't want more bloodshed.  I think there's been too much already
> >> (the left's war on unborn children, the right's war on drugs, and
> >> other kinds too numerous to list).  But it is absolutely necessary
> >> that the crimes against peaceful and law-abiding U.S. Citizens, not to
> >> mention the nationals of many other countries who have been harmed by
> >> actions of our so-called "government," be ended.  Hopefully, by the
> >> most peaceful means possible.
> >>
> >> I too took an oath to defend the United States, its lawful government,
> >> its Constitution, its citizens, and its valid laws against all threats
> >> whether domestic or foreign.  So have millions of others.  We are
> >> greatly outnumbered by the traitors at the moment, but times and
> >> political winds do change, and I remain hopeful that someday we will
> >> be able to return to a legitimate, federal, Constitutional, republican
> >> form of government.
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> >Thank you!  Well put!
> >
> >--
> >V
> >
>
>
> Hmmmmm, ya'll are living in a different USA than I am.  Maybe I took a
> wrong turn somewhere, I just don't see these multitudes of traitors
> strolling around everyday.
>
>
> "May you always have fair winds and following seas..."
>
> Paul Holloway



------------------------------

From: "Roger Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:12:16 -0800

Don't encourage the little moron. He doesn't know the difference between a
nazi and a communist, both of which I am according to him.  He's just an
oxygen bandit.

Roger
AIRBORNE!

"Scott Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > Let's suppose for a moment, Roger, that you are not, in fact, a
> > fully indoctrinated Communist.
> >
> > If that is so...then I'm sure that you can specifically name a few
> > of the ways in which you fundamentally disagree with Communist
philosophy.
> >
> > Accuracy counts, so be precise
>
> That sounds like the McCarthy era hearings, putting the burden of proof
> on someone to prove that somehow they are not something.  You are the
> one who needs to be precise: what do you consider the "philosophy of
> communism" to be?  For me it would be: 1) no private property, the state
> owns and controls all means of production; 2) no democracy, as democracy
> is to communists a tool of bourgeious capitalists; rather, you need a
> vanguard party to guide society to utopia; 3) a fundamental belief that
> human nature, culture, and politics are all products of the economic
> mode of production, and 4) a belief that once you change the mode of
> production to a purely socialist system where the state has managed to
> push away capitalist ideas and has created a communist culture, then the
> state can whither away as the people, no longer poisoned by capitalist
> exploitation will cooperate.
>
> Even though you didn't ask me, I certainly don't believe any of the
> four.  I've traveled a bit in Russia and know a lot of people there,
> communism Soviet style sucked.  I haven't seen any other poster profess
> any of these things.  So your question seems to be a distraction and
> obfuscation of a debate, and serves no purpose except to try to put
> yourself on the offensive.



------------------------------

From: "Roger Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:13:24 -0800

See.  Dealing with an ignorant person.

Roger
AIRBORNE!

"billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:m1kx6.17651$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>
> > > > Americans weren't going around telling everyone that their primary
> > > > political goal was to spark bloody revolutions.
> > > >
> > > > the Soviets were
> > > >
> > > > Spot the difference
> > >
> > > America supported insurgencies and counter insurgencies quietly.
Little
> > > difference.  Our record in South America speaks for itself.
> >
> >
> > And this supports the typical communist-advocates "the government
> > can do no wrong" line of thinking how, exactly?
>
> Try to stay on track and keep a line of thought, would ya.  It's a simple
> fact that in the support of insurgencies and counter insurgencies, there
was
> little difference between the USSR and the USA.  You contend above that
> there was a difference and imply that the difference was significant.
>
>



------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Here is the response from Microsoft regarding Linux and Piracy:
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:48:06 -0500

Charles Lyttle wrote:
> 
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > Charles Lyttle wrote:
> > >
> > > Joel Barnett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Adam Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matthew Gardiner"
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From          Microsoft Anti-Piracy Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date
> > > > > >      Thursday, March 29, 2001 6:31 pm To              Matthew Gardiner
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject      Re: Piracy???? (KMM187946C0KM)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  We suggest that you contact Linux.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Microsoft Corporation
> > > > > >  Worldwide Sales & Support Group
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL
> > > > >
> > > > > Great response from MS, Matthew. I hope you're attempting to have a
> > > > > conversation with your kernel right now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's be charitable: Maybe it was a typo, and the MS support person
> > > > > instead meant to write:
> > > > >
> > > > > We suggest that you contact Linus.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Or, perhaps the MS person realized the stupidity of the question and
> > > > intentionally gave a stupid answer.
> > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Adam
> > > >
> > > > jbarntt
> > > Doubtful. I've just been talking to the support people from another
> > > major company that makes DSP chips.
> > > ME : Hi, I have need information on emulators for your AAABBB DSP chip.
> > > SUPPORT : Is that a calculator?
> > > ME : No. Its a "Digital Signal Processor" semiconductor chip.
> > > SUPPORT :  Oh. Have you visited our web site xx.com.
> > > ME : I tried, but it doesn't come up.
> > > SUPPORT : Well what did you type for the URL?
> > > ME : XX.com and it 404ed
> > > SUPPORT : What's 404ed?
> > > ME : It didn't come up.
> > > SUPPORT : That's because its been changed to xx.education.com.
> > > ME : Let me try that. (Enters URL in browser)
> > >      I get a site that talks about programs for primary grade school
> > > children.
> > > SUPPORT : That is where we have all the information on our calculators.
> > > ME : I have a meeting to go to. I'll call back later.
> >
> > Tell your local sales rep.  That's the most effective way to get
> > such problems fixed.
> >
> > When salesmen mention customer complaints...people listen.
> >
> I would be most happy to talk to the local sales rep. If there was one.
> It seems that with the internet, that company has decided there is no
> need for local sales reps. Nor is there any need to provide personal
> support to multi-million dollar customers. Do a search on their name via
> google and you get hits on hundreds of stories about them missing
> projections.

Then it's time to send a clearly-written letter to the director of
sales, and notify him that you are prepared to dump his product and
migrate to a competing vendor, if support does not improve within 90 days.

But before you do that....make sure you get a working evaluation
system (fully configured) from said competition.



-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: "Roger Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:15:16 -0800

Ahh, now I haven't ever heard that before!  Spoken like a true leg.

Roger
AIRBORNE!

"GreyCloud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > Roger Perkins wrote:
> > >
> > > aaron, aaron, aaron, your ass must be frostbitten hanging out the way
it
> > > does.  How does someone as stupid as you survive in the modern world.
Now,
> > > I know that's now where you mind is, but still!  You don't know
history, you
> > > don't know politics, you certainly don't know the military but you
insist on
> > > shooting your mouth off.
> >
> > False premise,
> >
> > Ah yes, Roger's favorite method of debate..
> >
> > Proof by ... assertion.
> >
> > Check out the local university and see if the philosophy department has
> > a course on logic and epistomology.
> >
> > >
> > > Roger
> > > AIRBORNE!
> >
> > What happened....cutoff the oxygen to your brain for too long from
> > getting your head caught in the shroud lines....
> >
> > >
>
> While in Basic training in the Army, the drill instructor said if you
> want to be an AirBorne Ranger that's up to you... then said "But two
> things fall out of the sky: Bird shit and Fools!"
>
>
> > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Ian Davey wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >He's gonna use nukes against an invasion force on his own
beaches,
> > > > > >so that the fallout can blow all over the island, making the
entire
> > > > > >place uninhabitable....
> > > > >
> > > > > You're obviously misunderstanding how Nuclear weapons are used for
> > > defence.
> > > > > See the Cold War for instance. It's a case of "hit me and I'll
launch my
> > > > > Nuclear arsenals at your cities". I can't believe you thought he
meant
> > > the
> > > > > above... not even Castro would have been that stupid.
> > > > >
> > > > > >Yeah...right...you're a loony you are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Remember...several MILLION Americans took an oath to defend the
> > > Constitution
> > > > > >from all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >So...when we line you up against the wall....don't forget
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                        I TOLD YOU SO.
> > > > >
> > > > > What, is America a dictatorship now. When did that happen? Or are
do you
> > > > > see the US turning into a dictatorship in the future?
Interesting...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > No...but the penalty for treason still includes death by firing
squad.
> > > > And if it's wartime, drawing-and-quartering is ALSO a valid penalty.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > ian.
> > > > >
> > > > >  \ /
> > > > > (@_@)  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
> > > > > /(&)\  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/
(art)
> > > > >  | |
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > > Unix Systems Engineer
> >   The wise man is mocked by fools.
> >
> > --
> > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > Unix Systems Engineer
> > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > ICQ # 3056642
> >
> > K: Truth in advertising:
> >         Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
> >         Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
> >         Special Interest Sierra Club,
> >         Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> >         Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> >         The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> >         Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> >
> > J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> >    The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> >    also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> >
> > I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> >    challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> >    between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> >    Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> >
> > H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> >     premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> >     you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> >     you are lazy, stupid people"
> >
> > G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
> >
> > F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> >    adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> >
> > E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> >    her behavior improves.
> >
> > D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> >    ...despite (C) above.
> >
> > C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> >
> > B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> >    method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> >    direction that she doesn't like.
> >
> > A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
> --
> V



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************

Reply via email to