Linux-Advocacy Digest #360, Volume #33            Wed, 4 Apr 01 19:13:05 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: Microsoft should be feared and despised (Chris Ahlstrom)
  Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("billh")
  Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant ("Ben L. Titzer")
  Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
  Re: Baseball ("Matthew Gardiner")
  Re: Communism (Gunner ©)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 18:05:36 -0400

"Scott D. Erb" wrote:
> 
> > Alex Chaihorsky wrote:
> > >
> > > "Scott D. Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >
> > >
> > > >                          However, I suspect Marx would be spinning in
> > > > his grave to see his ideas associated with Stalin or Mao.  Ideological
> > > > development is complex.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have to address this before I address anything else, because I think this
> > > is pivotal.
> > > Marx was a monster. If you read Manifesto you will find:
> 
> Marx was naive.  He believed that if you got rid of capitalism you could have 
>complete
> liberty, the state would whither away, you would end exploitation.  He was motivated
> by the industrial slums, and how horrid the workers were paid.  He wanted the workers
> to rise up against that, and believed if they did they could collectively control the
> means of production and everyone would be better off.


And yet, you still promote the policies based on the theories of this
man WHO YOU HAVE JUST ADMITTED was a fool.


> 
> He was wrong.  Dead wrong.  Tragically wrong.  But there is no way Marx or Engels 
>(and
> I've read a lot of their private writings, including a lot of Engels stuff in the
> original German) would have ever supported the kind of brutal tactics of a Stalin, 
>Mao
> or Pol Pot.


And yet, you still push for the kinds of policies which can ONLY be
successfully implemented by a Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot.

Why is that?


> 
> > > 1. Complete liquidation of private property
> > > 2. Liquidation of the family, introduction of "official, open mutual
> > > ownership of wives"
> > > 3. Children taken from families are brought up by community (Hillary,
> > > hello!)
> > > 4. Industrial armies, not employer - employee, (and that is from the guy who
> > > LOVES proletariat!)
> > > 5. Central credit by central banks with total banking monopoly for the
> > > State.
> > > 6. Age when children start working - 9 years of age (Resolution of Geneva
> > > International Congress).
> > >
> > > If this is not the most monstrous document in the history of the
> > > civilization, please, state which one is.
> > >
> > > This system was implemented four times almost totally  - in Hitler's
> > > concentration camps, Stalin's GULAG and Mao's re-educational settlements and
> > > Pol Pots' Cambodia camps.
> > > Partially - USSR, Red China, Vietnam, North Korea.
> > > Superficially - Poland, E. Germany, Hungary, Mongolia, Czeckoslovakia
> > >
> > > Why would Marx be spiining other than out of excitment?
> > > Typical (I hate this word) socialist attitude - they all have aberrated
> > > Marx. NO! THEY DIDN'T!
> > > All socialists remain civilized untill they seize the power. Then the
> > > Marxist bestiary begins.
> > > EVERY TIME.
> 
> Marx was fantasizing about what he thought would lead to a utopia.  He was wrong.   
>He
> thought the state would whither away, it didn't.  His goal was to end alienation and
> create perfect liberty, his ideas did not lead that direction.  His errors were
> typical of 19th century social science (over-determination, bad predictions), and
> ultimately the errors in his theories helped lead to the kinds of horror you
> describe.  But to demonize Marx personally because of that is simply misguided, and 
>of
> course irrelevant.
> 
> At the very least now Social Democrats and most leftists recognize that the vision of
> "scientific socialism" espoused by Lenin and the Communists was not only wrong, but
> evil in its actions.   Social Democracy does not lead to the kind of evil you
> describe.  Sweden has no gulags, Norway is not run like Pol Pot's China.  You're
> overstating your case.  The danger comes not from Marx, but from any attempt to
> centralize power to try to shape society without that power being accountable to the
> people.  Marx was dead wrong not to understand or realize that, but I am convinced
> that he and Engels personally would have been appalled by what later was done in 
>their
> name.  Their theory was a failure, but to demonize them is simply silly.
> cheers, scott
> http://violet.umf.maine.edu/~erb/


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 18:08:14 -0400

"Scott D. Erb" wrote:
> 
> > Alex Chaihorsky wrote:
> > >
> > > "Scott D. Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > >
> > >
> > > >                          However, I suspect Marx would be spinning in
> > > > his grave to see his ideas associated with Stalin or Mao.  Ideological
> > > > development is complex.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have to address this before I address anything else, because I think this
> > > is pivotal.
> > > Marx was a monster. If you read Manifesto you will find:
> 
> Marx was naive.  He believed that if you got rid of capitalism you could have 
>complete
> liberty, the state would whither away, you would end exploitation.  He was motivated
> by the industrial slums, and how horrid the workers were paid.  He wanted the workers
> to rise up against that, and believed if they did they could collectively control the
> means of production and everyone would be better off.
> 
> He was wrong.  Dead wrong.  Tragically wrong.  But there is no way Marx or Engels 
>(and
> I've read a lot of their private writings, including a lot of Engels stuff in the
> original German) would have ever supported the kind of brutal tactics of a Stalin, 
>Mao
> or Pol Pot.
> 
> > > 1. Complete liquidation of private property
> > > 2. Liquidation of the family, introduction of "official, open mutual
> > > ownership of wives"
> > > 3. Children taken from families are brought up by community (Hillary,
> > > hello!)
> > > 4. Industrial armies, not employer - employee, (and that is from the guy who
> > > LOVES proletariat!)
> > > 5. Central credit by central banks with total banking monopoly for the
> > > State.
> > > 6. Age when children start working - 9 years of age (Resolution of Geneva
> > > International Congress).
> > >
> > > If this is not the most monstrous document in the history of the
> > > civilization, please, state which one is.
> > >
> > > This system was implemented four times almost totally  - in Hitler's
> > > concentration camps, Stalin's GULAG and Mao's re-educational settlements and
> > > Pol Pots' Cambodia camps.
> > > Partially - USSR, Red China, Vietnam, North Korea.
> > > Superficially - Poland, E. Germany, Hungary, Mongolia, Czeckoslovakia
> > >
> > > Why would Marx be spiining other than out of excitment?
> > > Typical (I hate this word) socialist attitude - they all have aberrated
> > > Marx. NO! THEY DIDN'T!
> > > All socialists remain civilized untill they seize the power. Then the
> > > Marxist bestiary begins.
> > > EVERY TIME.
> 
> Marx was fantasizing about what he thought would lead to a utopia.  He was wrong.   
>He
> thought the state would whither away, it didn't.  His goal was to end alienation and
> create perfect liberty, his ideas did not lead that direction.  His errors were
> typical of 19th century social science (over-determination, bad predictions), and
> ultimately the errors in his theories helped lead to the kinds of horror you
> describe.  But to demonize Marx personally because of that is simply misguided, and 
>of
> course irrelevant.
> 
> At the very least now Social Democrats and most leftists recognize that the vision of
> "scientific socialism" espoused by Lenin and the Communists was not only wrong, but

And why did it take 80 FUCKING YEARS for you assholes to admit what we have
been saying all along????????


> evil in its actions.   Social Democracy does not lead to the kind of evil you
> describe.

Prove it.

>             Sweden has no gulags, Norway is not run like Pol Pot's China.  You're

Norway and Sweden are both cutting back on the socialism, too.
ESPECIALLY SWEDEN.
Why is that?

> overstating your case.  The danger comes not from Marx, but from any attempt to
> centralize power to try to shape society without that power being accountable to the
> people.  Marx was dead wrong not to understand or realize that, but I am convinced
> that he and Engels personally would have been appalled by what later was done in 
>their
> name.  Their theory was a failure, but to demonize them is simply silly.
> cheers, scott
> http://violet.umf.maine.edu/~erb/


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Microsoft should be feared and despised
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 22:09:53 GMT

Chad Everett wrote:
> 
> LICENSE TO CHAD EVERETT:
> ------------------------
> By posting messages, uploading files, inputting data, submitting any
> feedback or suggestions, or engaging in any other form of communication
> with or through the comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy or comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
> USENET newsgroups, you warrant and represent that you own or otherwise control
> the rights necessary to do so and since the communications you post will reside
> on Chad Everett computer systems and storage, you are granting Chad Everett
> and his agents permission to:
> 
> 1. Use, modify, copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly
> perform, reproduce, publish, sublicense, create derivative works from,
> transfer, or sell any such communication.
> 2. Sublicense to third parties the unrestricted right to exercise any of
> the foregoing rights granted with respect to the communication.
> 3. Publish your name in connection with any such communication.

You can't have my precious words!  <grin>

I feel like spamming Microsoft.  Send them a virtual petition.
The clowns.  Evil clowns.

Chris

-- 
[ Do Not Make Illegal Copies of This Message ]

------------------------------

From: "billh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 22:10:11 GMT


"Aaron R. Kulkis"


> You have no clue what my family situation is like.
> Do the words "extended family" mean anything to you?
>
> There are others in my family who currently need my assistance.

I pity them.  I truly do.


> How many specialists provide top-off-the-line computer consulting
> services for several Fortune 500 companies?

Self-aggrandizing again, we see.  Gee, once one of several thousand
employees at GM.  LOL!!!  Kulkis, as a proven "war-hero" lying wannabe, no
believes anything you say.  You've cursed yourself with no credibility.



------------------------------

From: "Ben L. Titzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.arch
Subject: Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:02:08 -0500

On 4 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:

> "Ben L. Titzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
> > Compaq has several Xeon based servers (4x, 8x, and even more) that have up
> > to 32 and 64gb of physical RAM. Any kernel running on those machines
> > wouldn't "need" that much memory; it would of course, have to manage it,
> 
> Actually it would -- for program/data cache if your application doesn't cache 
> itself
> (pretty much anything except for databases) 
>

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this. The OS has to *manage* all of
physical memory pages and portion them out to processes as usual. It's not
particularly tricky, even with more than 4gb worth of physical pages. Each
application still only has 4gb of virtual address space. Each process would
have to have more complicated scheme to manage more than 4gb memory
(handle based probably), but that wasn't what I was talking about. 

PAE support in the kernel is really a trivial addition, it only
requires modifications to the page tables (3 levels instead of 2) in order
to allow applications to be mapped into physical memory pages above 4gb.
Where it gets complicated is the whole handle-based memory allocation
schemes in order to let a process play with more memory. Each application
(and hell, even the OS(1)) can only address 4gb of memory at one time.
 
(1) Most OSes don't have to directly address all of physical memory in
order to manage it. Instead it keeps track of pages of physical
memory indirectly and maps them into the address space as needed. Also,
most OSes actually run in a reserved portion of the virtual address spaces
of all processes that remains common across all processes. This is so that
an address space switch doesn't need to occur (expensive computationally
for the processor) in order for the OS to take control.


> > though, for user applications. Versions of Windows 2000 server have
> > support for these large memory spaces, and I *think* there may be Linux
> > support. Plus whatever OSes companies like Compaq and HP have running on
> > their "big-iron" Intel boxes probably have PAE support as well. 
> 
> Linux 2.4 supports PAE, but has no support for "address window extensions" 
> or other such horrible things. It also needs bounce buffers for high IO.
> 

That's what I figured about Linux. I'm not too sure about other OSes like
Solaris and HP-UX.

-Ben

_________________________________________________
 Close Windows and Open Doors - www.redpants.org


------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 18:11:56 -0400

Knowledge Seeker wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am looking for a full-featured yet easy to use text editor to
> replace Notepad.  Ideally, I would like a tool that is cross-platform
> or has versions for Win98 and Linux.  The main platform requirement
> would be Win98 and the nice-to-have platform is Linux.
> 
> There seem to be a plethora of choices that might work:
> UltraEdit
> TextPad
> EditPlus
> WinEdit
> Multi-Edit
> Zeus
> CRiSP
> 
> Right now I am leaning to UltraEdit but I have not done a true
> rigorous evaluation.  I would definitely like to hear from anybody
> that has done a true objective comparative evaluation of these
> products (or others that I have not listed).
> 
> My actual requirements are:
> 
> Must haves:
> 1.      Syntax highlighting (with color and or font) for HTML and Java
> 2.      Robust cut and paste including row, AND column AND block
> capabilities
> 3.      Split and join functions based on margin or specified column
> 4.      Ability to intelligently remove prefix characters (i.e. ">") and
> re-format text to new margins keeping paragraphs intact (i.e. fixing
> forwarded email text)
> 5.      Ability to edit multiple files side-by-side
> 6.      Ability to compare files and synchronize multiple similar files
> flagging differences
> 7.      Robust search and replace capabilities (ideally supporting
> regular expressions)
> 8.      Line numbering
> 9.      Column numbering
> 10.     Auto-completion (based on customizable template)of common
> programming statements
> 11.     Ability to preview HTML pages (including Java applets) easily
> 12.     HTML toolbar (I know I should know all the tags but I just cannot
> remember them all)

  WIMP!


> 13.     Can be used as a replacement for Notepad (so it must be
> relatively quick and have a small footprint)
> 14.     Highlights URL and e-mail addresses and launches browser or email
> client in a separate window when clicked
> 15.     Ability to change case for entire selected text
> 16.     Auto indent based on user-defined templates for each programming
> language
> 17.     Auto alignment (I.e. if I want a set of lines with the "=" sign
> or decimal point or comma aligned on multiple rows)
> 18.     Undo capability
> 
> Nice to haves:
> 1. Syntax highlighting for Perl, C/C++, and SQL.  Also, extensibility
> for other programming languages based on easily customized syntax
> files.
> 2. Ability to use FTP

That's not the job of a text editor, but most good editors can
handle TFTP with a user-defined macro in a startup file.


> 3. Spell checker
> 4. Ability to compile from within the editor
> 5. Keystroke save/execute (i.e. macro capability)


try VIM.  Does everything EXCEPT #12.


> 
> --
> eCommerce Knowledge Seeker


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------

From: "Matthew Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Baseball
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:19:30 +1200

LOL

Maybe Microsoft will go the full monty and deliver a stable OS for once?

Matthew Gardiner

"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Matthew Gardiner wrote:
> >
> > Don't you mean, the "Full Monty"? Monty Python is total different to the
> > "full monty"
>
> It was a word play...
>
> But..it makes me wonder if....Monty Python wasn't a sly reference to
> the british slang-term "full monty"...
>
> It does all ... fit together...heheh
>
>
> >
> > Matthew Gardiner
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Tom Wilson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > On Tue, 03 Apr 2001 22:01:09 +1200, Matthew Gardiner
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >Ever played rugby? Ever been in the position of having a 140KG
Somoan
> > > > charging towards you
> > > > > >(and you're only 85KG), and being hammered when trying to tackle
the
> > > > person?  I also find
> > > > > >it rather amazing how little Septic Tanks know about the world
> > outside
> > > > the US?  Did you
> > > > > >know we have Televisions, Tree's, cars, computers, I know, its
> > probably
> > > > has come as quite a
> > > > > >big shock to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Matthew Gardiner
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Big deal.  You don't have the SuperBowl.  Are those tin cans you
drive
> > > > around in called
> > > > > "cars"?
> > > >
> > > > Hey! Austin Healeys were damned cool! I had one albeit briefly. At
6'3",
> > I
> > > > didn't so much drive it as wear it
> > > >
> > > > > Here in America we call them go-carts.  Yes, you do have
television,
> > but
> > > > it's
> > > > > really crappy.
> > > >
> > > > I'll take "Are You Being Served?" reruns over OUR television any day
of
> > the
> > > > week.
> > > > Also....Two words.... Monty Python
> > >
> > > Not to be confused with "The Full Monty Python".....or is it?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > > Unix Systems Engineer
> > > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > > ICQ # 3056642
> > >
> > > K: Truth in advertising:
> > > Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
> > > Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
> > > Special Interest Sierra Club,
> > > Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> > > Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> > > The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> > > Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> > >
> > >
> > > J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> > >    The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> > >    also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> > >
> > > I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> > >    challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> > >    between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> > >    Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> > >
> > > H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> > >     premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> > >     you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> > >     you are lazy, stupid people"
> > >
> > > G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
> > >
> > >
> > > F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues
against
> > >    adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> > >
> > > E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> > >    her behavior improves.
> > >
> > > D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> > >    ...despite (C) above.
> > >
> > > C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> > >
> > > B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> > >    method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> > >    direction that she doesn't like.
> > >
> > > A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shelala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
>    The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
>    also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
>    challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
>    between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
>    Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
>     premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
>     you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
>     you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
>    adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
>    her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
>    ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
>    method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
>    direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.



------------------------------

From: Gunner © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.destroy.microsoft,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:18:11 -0700

On 3 Apr 2001 13:14:47 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:

>>> >Said Aaron R. Kulkis in alt.destroy.microsoft on Fri, 30 Mar 2001
>>> >   [...]
>>> >>If someone attempts to enter your country, unanounced, without making
>>> >>proper contact with the appropriate authorities (customs officials,
>>> >>border patrol, air traffic control), then they are a legitimate target
>>> >>for those personnel charged with the DUTY of defending the border.
>>> 
>>> Ok, then you support the right of the Cuban government to shoot down
>>> Cessnas.
>
>Note: no response from Aaron. Perhaps he agrees with Castro?

Hummm sounds like a argument for the gunning down of a huge portion of
Californias latino population as well....

gunner

--
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin to
clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because Liberals are
so stupid it is easy work."  Steven M. Barry

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************

Reply via email to