Linux-Advocacy Digest #831, Volume #33 Mon, 23 Apr 01 16:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
(d'geezer@d'geezer.net)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Windows 2000 Rocks! (Chad Everett)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Bud Frawley)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Communism
Re: Windows 2000 Rocks! (Donn Miller)
Re: Anyone have any stats on how many times RedHat 7.1 is being downloaded? (Chad
Everett)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: d'geezer@d'geezer.net
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Reply-To: d'geezer@d'geezer.net
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:45:05 GMT
On 23 Apr 2001 15:59:29 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>>>>
>>>> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>>>
>>>So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>>
>>His daughter was raped be a raping intruder in his home, but of
>>course since his daughter's life was not in danger and he believes
>>all killing is wrong (unless YOUR life is threatened), he gave the
>>raper some cookies and milk when he was done and sent him on his way.
>
>Well, shooting at someone that's raping a woman is somewhat dangerous
>for the woman, is it not?
For those who are bad shots. One can usually get extraordinarily to a rapist in
the act.
>I would rather hit him in the kidneys with
>a blunt object.
Peachy. Me too. THEN I'll shot him.
>Killing a rapist in the act of commiting a rape is not self defense.
Oh? Ask the victim. Have you ever heard of AIDS?
Additionally we know that rather a large number of rapists decide, after all their
fun is over, that they should not leave a witness.
Yes, I'd say it is self defense. Shoot the fuckers.
>It can be a justified murder, though. But self defense? Nah.
You a law school grad, are you?
>I am amazed at how people will misrepresent anything in order to
>make a bogus point.
Yes, you do have considerably propensity for such.
>--
>Roberto Alsina
>
d'geezer
"Anyone who wants to get rid of all guns, thinks that the earth should
be ruled by large,strong men with swords and clubs. I think we
already tried that. It was called the Dark Ages."
Christopher Morton, Tue, 27 Mar 2001
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:44:29 -0400
WesTralia wrote:
>
is WesTralia your first name or your last name, coward
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > WesTralia wrote:
> > >
> > > Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Aaron, why are you so scared of women?
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is a question that needs asking? Hmmm... let's see:
> > >
> > > a) he has never had a date.
> >
> > 15 girlfriends, lots of sex, no dates.
> >
>
> Now we're getting somewhere! You have had 15 girlfriends, lots of
> sex, but NEVER had to date these "girls".
Go find your dictionary, and look up the word sarcasm.
> I think a cursory look under your bed just might reveal a couple
> of well used bicycle tire pumps.
More lies from WesTralia...another COWARD who hides behind
a fake address
>
> --
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 23 Apr 2001 19:44:30 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Roberto Alsina"
>
>> Remains a blatant assertion? Indeed!
>
>Truth quite often is blatant.
So are lies.
--
Roberto Alsina (who believes blatancy has zero truth value)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Rocks!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Apr 2001 14:23:23 -0500
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:04:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nils Zonneveld wrote:
>>
>> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>> >
>> > Macs are overly-dependant upon the GUI, just like LoseDOS.
>> >
>>
>> I think your problem with Mac OS will be solved by Mac OS X :-)
>
>Maybe.
>
>But I've been exceedingly disappointed in Apple ever since they
>introduced the MacIntosh.
>
>The Apple ][ series was extremely friendly to technically literate,
>and had an open architecture.
>
>The MacIntosh alienated me right off by
>
>a) being a locked box (access to expansion slots was not merely
> discouraged, it was downright prohibited).
That's an understatement. It didn't HAVE expansion slots.
>
>b) abandoned the CLI ENTIRELY for a woefully under-developed GUI.
>
>Very few Apple ][ users ever bothered with the Mac series.
I had a Apple II with a Z-80 CPU card installed so I could run CP/M.
I bought a Mac when it came out. It was pretty darn limited, but
the GUI was revolutionary for a "home" computer back then. They
were REALLY hard to open up too. You needed a 6" long torx tool
and a really thin strong piece of metal to crack the case.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 23 Apr 2001 19:47:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:36:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >On 23 Apr 2001 15:59:29 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>> >>>
>> >>>His daughter was raped be a raping intruder in his home, but of
>> >>>course since his daughter's life was not in danger and he believes
>> >>>all killing is wrong (unless YOUR life is threatened), he gave the
>> >>>raper some cookies and milk when he was done and sent him on his way.
>> >>
>> >>Well, shooting at someone that's raping a woman is somewhat dangerous
>> >>for the woman, is it not? I would rather hit him in the kidneys with
>> >>a blunt object.
>> >>
>> >>Killing a rapist in the act of commiting a rape is not self defense.
>> >>It can be a justified murder, though. But self defense? Nah.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Ah, so we have just added another reason where killing is justified
>> >in Roberto's book.
>>
>> Sure. I'm sure there's plenty more I haven't thinked yet.
>>
>> >Justified killing:
>> >
>> > 1. self defense
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > 2. killing a rapist in the act of raping
>>
>> No. Not in all cases. Only if he can not be stopped by other means,
>> if killing him doesn't endanger anyone, and so on. I really prefer,
>> if at all possible, that the rapist not be killed.
>
>Remind me to come over to your house and rape your wife.
I knew you had that proclivity.
>Remember, according to your rules, you can't kill me!
You can't read, either. I may have to kill you. If you make
it hard for me to stop you, you gonna end dead, boy. So,
don't make it hard (in both senses).
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: Bud Frawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:47:56 -0500
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:40:02 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> Bud Frawley wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:08:02 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> > > Bud Frawley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 23 Apr 2001 11:52:21 -0500, Chad Everett said...
> > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:58:14 -0500, Bud Frawley
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:52:42 GMT, John Jones said...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> "Bud Frawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > >> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:44:01 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> > > > > >> > > Bud Frawley wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:13:02 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> > > > > >> > > > > MH wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > "jet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > >> > > > > > news:9c06um$1o3m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > >> > > > > > > news:vEFE6.1319$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Any man who supports Feminism is a self-flagellating
> > > > > >> idiot.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Any man who thinks a woman should be paid the same for
>equal
> > > > > >> work is a
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > self
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > flagellating idiot?
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > No, just any man who marries one.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Any man who marries a woman who thinks she should get paid the
> > > > > >> same as a
> > > > > >> > > > > > man
> > > > > >> > > > > > > for the same work is a self flagellating idiot?
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > LOL.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > J
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Pay is not the issue. I've no problem with women getting equal
> > > > > >> pay.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > But try to find a woman who TRULY does equal work...like coming in
> > > > > >> early,
> > > > > >> > > > > or staying late, as needed. Or going out of town on a business
>trip
> > > > > >> > > > > on short notice....or transferring half way across the country (or
> > > > > >> > > > > even to an office 20 miles farther from her house).
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Quite frankly...there are reasons why the STATISTICAL AVERAGE for
> > > > > >> > > > > women's pay is so much lower than men...they refuse to go to the
> > > > > >> > > > > same lengths that men will to *EARN* it'
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > LOL!!!!! I guess you just proved your not a manager! when my cousin
> > > > > >> got
> > > > > >> > > > promotyed to manager in his company he showed me the pay list!
>there
> > > > > >> was
> > > > > >> > > > 2 different pays 1 for men 1 for women! men got paid $13.00 an hour
> > > > > >> when
> > > > > >> > > > women got paid $9.00 an hour for the same shift! I told him it's not
> > > > > >> fair
> > > > > >> > > > and they should pay the same so he filed an greavence. they said no
> > > > > >> way.
> > > > > >> > > > he quit that job in a hurry! I bet they stop laughing when I call
>feds
> > > > > >> on
> > > > > >> > > > this one! they offered him mney to keep quiet but I said no way I'm
> > > > > >> > > > keepiung quiet! this is gonna hit the papers when I start talking!
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Men show up for work more reliably.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > LOL!!!! ya right! I left out the part when he showed me there time cards
> > > > > >> > because I knew you'd bite! the women get there every day ON TIME! when
> > > > > >> > somebody's show's up late it's always a man! those are statistics my
>boy!
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Do you know how much a production work stoppage costs a factory?
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > A hell of more than $4.00/hour.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > LOL! like they lower there prices when it stops! you do'nt pay for when
> > > > > >> > it stops because the owner is right there! I guess you think he has to
> > > > > >> > pay himself when it stops! LOL!!!!!
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > As long as women insist on group rights, then they will suffer
> > > > > >> > > group penalties as well.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > By the way, who put a gun to these women's heads and FORCED them
> > > > > >> > > to accept $9.00.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > thank's for proving your a complete moron! they either take $9.00 or
>they
> > > > > >> > get fired! that's as bad a holding a gun to there heads if you want to
> > > > > >> > support a family!
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > It appears that management offered $9.00/hour, and they accepted.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I'm gonna say this one more time so take the beans outa your ears THAT"S
> > > > > >> > ALL THE JOB PAYS FOR WOMEN! maybe you should go back to the dumass farm!
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > All this displays is that most women are exceptionally poor
> > > > > >> > > negotiators.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > care to provide a cite? I guess not!
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > So of course, they have to get a law passed to protect them, because
> > > > > >> > > they are so strong, and equal.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > if men were paid less then women they would pass a law so fast it would
> > > > > >> > make your head spin!
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> They already did - It's the Equal Pay Act of 1963. It prohibits paying
> > > > > >> people less for the same work becasue of their sex. Tell your cousin
>about
> > > > > >> it.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >another republiCON moron which think's when a republiCON is in the white
> > > > > >house all laws for equality are all enforced! I guess you did'nt read my
> > > > > >post or you would of known they offerred him a bribe to keep quiet! I
> > > > > >guess you think they would do that if it was legal! to bad they do'nt
> > > > > >care! they pay less to women ! what part do'nt you understand? moron!
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a lie and you know it. We're still waiting for you to tell us
> > > > > what newspaper to look for this in when it "hits the papers".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I guess you'll just have to wait but it'll be a LOT of them I can tell
> > > > you that much! I hope you like egg on your face because that's what your
> > > > gonna have! LOL!!!!!!!!! my cousin said they usually pay BIG BUCKS for a
> > > > story like this! I have to get a lawyer first because my life is'nt gonna
> > > > be worth a plug nickel after this one breaks!
> > >
> > > So you admit that you are insane.
> > >
> > >
> > I guess you just proved whose the biggest dumass goin! it's not me I can
> > tell you that much!
>
>
> Bud, you wrote in the paragraph above:
> > > > I have to get a lawyer first because my life is'nt gonna
> > > > be worth a plug nickel after this one breaks!
>
> Thus, you just said that you endangered your own life, for nothing better
> than the purpose of a USENET argument.
>
> That, dear friends, is insane.
>
>
>
I'm willing to put my life in danger to get the truth out! this is a
story that must be told! I guess you fat cat republiCONS do'nt care about
the truth! to bad!
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:48:43 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:21:08 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:08:38 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:52:26 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:34:40 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 01:03:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >Mathew wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gunner© wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >Slavery;child labour
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > As opposed to a 16 yr old working at Burger King?
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> A 16 year old at Burger King, where they can only work part time,is
> >> >> >> >> >> >> hardly comparable to 12-14 hour work days of children as young as
>6.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >In some parts of the world, such work is FAR more useful to the child
> >> >> >> >> >> >than any high-end education (when living in a 3rd-world shithole,
> >> >> >> >> >> >lessons on astrophysics are....a luxery. Food on the table is a
> >> >> >> >> >> >necessity. Hope that helps).
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> There's a wide spectrum between no education and astrophysics.
> >> >> >> >> >> And if you work 12 hours a day at a back-breaking job when you are
> >> >> >> >> >> a kid, you don't get any education.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >What good is an education if you have starved to death?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The black-and-whiteness of your mind is amazing.
> >> >> >> >> There is a solution to this: feed the kid at (public) school.
> >> >> >> >> Of course you would believe that kid is stealing your money.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Roberto Alsina
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Nope, by Aarons logic, some how the staving child is funded by gold from
> >> >> >> >Moscow as to suck in people into this "communist plot" to take over the
> >> >> >> >world whilst using the power of the Democrats, Unions, and other
> >> >> >> >assorted people intertwined into this communist take over of the world.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Here's my guess: Moscow paid unions to make workers vote parties who
> >> >> >> don't see feeding the poor kid as a waste of money (communists!).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, when the government steals Aaron's money to feed the kid (communists!)
> >> >> >> the kid is being told that good daddy government (communist!) is feeding
> >> >> >> him, thus he is being indoctrined (little communist!).
> >> >> >
> >> >> >What part of "taking money from MY kids to feed YOUR kids is THEFT"
> >> >>
> >> >> What part of that what? And who said they are my kids?
> >> >
> >> >forcibly taking money from MY kids to feed ANY other man's kids is THEFT
> >>
> >> You have kids? The government should require a license for that.
> >
> >Statist asshole.
>
> The government should protect people from danger.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the police have ZERO obligation to
protect people from danger. They are only required to investigate crimes.
If they also HAPPEN to protect the people, then that's great...but, legally,
it's not part of the job description (although protecting POLITICIANS is).
> Isn't that why people should pay for the army?
No. That's why every able-bodied male should SERVE in the army.
We need to bring back the draft so that smart-aleck little cowards
like you will pull your fair share of the load....or rot in jail.
>
> >> And you didn't answer the first question.
> >
> >You never answered my question, either.
>
> That was not a question. It was not even a sentence!
>
> >I will ask again. When did you stop raping your daughter?
>
> I don't have a daughter.
>
> >Your answer gets you mine.
>
> There you have it. Your turn.
>
> >> >> >And Theft is slavery.
> >> >>
> >> >> No, theft is theft.
> >> >
> >> >Taking the fruits of one person's labor, against their will, for the
> >> >benefit of another person is slavery, is it not?
> >>
> >> No, that's theft.
> >
> >Which is slavery.
>
> No, that's theft, which is not slavery.
Slavery is nothing more than theft.
Therefore, theft is slavery.
Hope that helps, moron.
>
> >> >Strangely enough, theft is taking the fruits of one person's labor,
> >> >against their will, for the benefit of another person.
> >>
> >> Yes, that's theft, in some cases[1]. What that is not is slavery.
> >>
> >> >Therefore, theft is slavery.
> >>
> >> No, therefore, theft is theft.
> >
> >You are truly obtuse, aren't you.
>
> Well, I am not the one that's trying to prove two things are the same
> by changing the definition of one to be the definition of the other.
>
> >> >> >You *DO* know the proper punishment for those who enslave others, don't you?
> >> >>
> >> >> They become you? Isn't that unusual and cruel?
> >> >
> >> >Do you not believe that those who enslave others forfeit their rights?
> >>
> >> Nope. I believe all humans have human rights.
> >>
> >> [1] Taking the money earned by a drug dealer and giving it to the DEA
> >> is not theft, is it Aaron? Yet you are taking the fruits of the dealer's
> >> labour, against their will, for the benefit of other persons.
> >>
> >> Theft is defined, among other things, by being against the law.
> >
> >You write like someone who wants to belittle slavery as "mere theft"...
>
> Actually, no. I believe slavery is something much worse than theft.
> Yet you claim theft is slavery. I would say YOU are the one that
> belittles slavery.
>
> >and will then proceed to spin some wild-assed story about why his
> >slavery cum theft is justified.
>
> You, my friend, are confused.
You obviously don't know about all the different forms of slavery.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:48:19 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>> >>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> >> Yes, and advocating shooting people because they are democrats
>> >> >> >> does not qualify. Ever.
>> >>
Aaron> Wrong. I advocate taking a VOTE on whether democrats should be shot,
Aaron> according to Democrat ideals (will of the majority = final decision).
>> >>
>> >> >> In the past you have advocated shooting people just for being
>> >> >> democrats.
>> >>
Aaron> Wrong, I advocate shooting those who are actively sleek to enslave me,
Aaron> you, and the rest of the American populace.
>> >>
>> >> You are lying again. For proof, anyone can search google
>> >> for posts by you containing the phrase "shoot a democrat"
>> >>
>> >> You are a liar, a particularly stupid liar.
>>
Aaron> Save America
Aaron> Shoot a demoncrook
>>
>> That would get more hits, but two
>> come up:
>>
>> Save America, Shoot a democrat.
Aaron> the Democratic Party is a bunch of Marxists, who, knowing that using
Aaron> the name Communists would be bad PR, engage in a campaign of deception
Aaron> to get the populace of the country to vote for their own enslavement.
Aaron> ANYBODY who seeks to enslave others sacrifices any claim to his own life.
Aaron> Hope that helps.
At least you admit you were lying when you said you had
not advocated shooting people just for being democrats.
IF you were a fan of freedom instead of a totalitarian,
you would not advocate killing people for their ideas,
but rather overt actions that are endangering the lives
of others.
But you are not a fan of freedom, but rather a cowardly
lying forging totalitarian wannabe.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:48:49 -0400
From: Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Rocks!
Henry_Barta wrote:
>
> Hullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's great.
>
> Yes! I actually got 15 days+ of uptime on my Win2K box.
Wow, not bad for what you paid for it, I'll bet...
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Subject: Re: Anyone have any stats on how many times RedHat 7.1 is being downloaded?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Apr 2001 14:27:24 -0500
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:31:17 GMT, Kelsey Bjarnason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"jtnews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>>
>> > Nice in theory, but... :)
>>
>> What theory? It worked for me on RedHat 7.0
>> 5 times for each computer I had.
>>
>> Then it worked again on RedHat 7.1 on my test
>> system just two days ago.
>
>Well, I've been through 4 burns, two machines, and about 897 different
>reboots, and RH71 refuses to admit that the CD it booted from is, in fact,
>an RH CD, refuses to connect to a server and refuses to read the info off
>the SCSI CD. All in all, a royal pain in the proverbials.
>
I downloaded all four RH 7.1 CDs last night. They're working great.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
