Linux-Advocacy Digest #68, Volume #35 Sat, 9 Jun 01 01:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Laugh, it's hilarious. (flatfish+++)
Re: what the heck is going on with the NYSE? ("Rich.")
Re: Linux dead on the desktop. ("Les Mikesell")
Re: More micro$oft "customer service" (Rick)
Re: Linux dead on the desktop. ("Les Mikesell")
Re: More micro$oft "customer service" (Rick)
Re: Why homosexuals are a threat to heterosexuals (Frog2)
Re: The beginning of the end for microsoft (Chris Morgan)
Re: So what software is the NYSE running ? (Dennis G. Allard)
Re: More micro$oft "customer service" (Dan)
Re: Why homosexuals are a threat to heterosexuals (mlw)
Re: More microsoft innovation (Dan)
Re: UI Importance (Pascal Haakmat)
Re: Here's a switch for a change (Ray Chason)
Re: Linux dead on the desktop. (Terry Porter)
Re: double whopper with cheese a threat to heterosexuals (Frog2)
Re: Argh - Ballmer (Charlie Ebert)
Re: Here's a switch for a change (Charlie Ebert)
Re: IBM Goes Gay (Charlie Ebert)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: flatfish+++ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.aol-sucks,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Laugh, it's hilarious.
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:15:21 GMT
On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 19:35:55 -0600, Dave Martel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Bowling for dollars.
Oh man do I remember that game show!
Bob Murphy the NY Mets sportscaster was the host and it was the
cheapest show on TV.
You'd get a $1.00 a pin and then you would have to split it with your
"pinpal" which was a name drawn from a large basket.
I was in school at the time and we used to make fun of that show all
the time.
flatfish+++
"Why do they call it a flatfish?"
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Rich." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Rich." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: what the heck is going on with the NYSE?
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:22:13 GMT
1 time in 2-1/2 years is better than pretty good. How many times has your
computer crashed in that time?
--
Rich
Some days you get the bear and
some days the bear gets you.
"Bob Hauck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:36:43 -0400, Anonymous
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > what the heck is going on with the NYSE?
> > How can a "computer problem" halt trading?
>
> Whatever it is, their system is so reliable that when it breaks it is a
> major news story. I'd say that is pretty good.
>
> --
> -| Bob Hauck
> -| To Whom You Are Speaking
> -| http://www.haucks.org/
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux dead on the desktop.
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:38:57 GMT
"Chad Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:3b20d820$0$94308$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > In article <3b14069b$0$94306$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "Chad Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > "Donn Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >> Chad Myers wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Don't forget security, of which the MacOS has none.
> > >>
> > >> Mac OS-X is based on BSD-unix (Darwin)...
> > >
> > > [snip irrelevant]
> > >
> > > we're talking about currently shipping MacOSes, not lala-ware.
> >
> > So where does that leave M$ when it comes to security? At the
> > bottom of the pile.
>
> Do YOU even know what you're talking about? Have you ever
> heard of NT or Windows 2000?
>
If he's like most of us he probably can only wish he hadn't.
My latest disaster with NT was a box set up as an ftp
server by someone who follows the updates and patches
pretty closely but it still ended up with a directory named
'PRN' last weekend that couldn't be removed and a bunch
of hidden files under it that half the world was downloading,
consuming most of our internet bandwidth. Security?
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: More micro$oft "customer service"
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 22:46:28 -0400
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
> "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> > >
> > > "Jim Polaski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > http://public.wsj.com/sn/y/SB991862595554629527.html
> > > >
> > > > Now if I'm the owner of a website and someone using M$ software comes
> > > > along and alters my site, I should think my lawyer is going to be
> > > > contacting someone about what unauthorized actions they have done. I
> > > > want to think I' see a legal issue here.
> > >
> > > If you consider that HTLM is a very weak page layout format to begin
> with,
> > > you will realize that no two web browsers ever display a page exactly
> the
> > > same, thus *EVERY* web browser alters it to some extent. It's possible
> for
> > > your page to be included in other pages via frames and many other
> things.
> > >
> > > This is the nature of the net. It's also not all that different from
> > > Netscapes "What's related" function. The only difference is that the
> smart
> > > tags appear inline (it doesn't change your actual page, just provides a
> way
> > > to hover over words and get more information).
> >
> > It provides a way for links to be followed from a page that were not
> > intended to be there. If I write a page, I dont want m$ changing it.
>
> And how is that any different from the links available based on a page from
> the Netscape "What's related" feature?
1. Its a micro$oft "feature"
2. Please describe this "what's realted feature". I am not familiar with
it. I rarely go to a netscape page purposely.
3. Benefit of doubt... even if it were the same, how would that excuce
micro$oft?
--
Rick
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux dead on the desktop.
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:43:46 GMT
"Chad Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:3b20d83a$0$94306$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> "Jan Johanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:3b204db4$0$214$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > "Bob Hauck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:36:03 GMT, Christopher L. Estep
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Star Office? (Max, it's available for Windows (and it's still free),
but
> > > >can't compare feature-wise to Office 97, let alone either 2000 *or*
the
> > > >just-released XP.)
> > >
> > > Name a feature that it lacks compared to Office 97.
> >
> > Can you embed a spreadsheet application within a word processing
document
> > all within a slide show presentation? Clicking on any section allows
full
> > power editing of that item within the native app.
>
> Hell, that's not just O97, that's Windows in general =)
>
Is it so difficult to open a new window in the operating system
that applications have to hide all that trouble from the user?
Or is this really just a ploy to force all the people who share
any data files to buy all of the same application programs?
(Which is most effective if you can get your apps bundled
with new PCs so everyone else in the office then has to
buy a copy of the app the boss got with his new box).
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: More micro$oft "customer service"
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 22:48:19 -0400
Dan wrote:
>
> In article <ujbU6.10069$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Jim Polaski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > http://public.wsj.com/sn/y/SB991862595554629527.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Now if I'm the owner of a website and someone using M$ software comes
> > > > > along and alters my site, I should think my lawyer is going to be
> > > > > contacting someone about what unauthorized actions they have done. I
> > > > > want to think I' see a legal issue here.
> > > >
> > > > If you consider that HTLM is a very weak page layout format to begin
> > with,
> > > > you will realize that no two web browsers ever display a page exactly
> > the
> > > > same, thus *EVERY* web browser alters it to some extent. It's possible
> > for
> > > > your page to be included in other pages via frames and many other
> > things.
> > > >
> > > > This is the nature of the net. It's also not all that different from
> > > > Netscapes "What's related" function. The only difference is that the
> > smart
> > > > tags appear inline (it doesn't change your actual page, just provides a
> > way
> > > > to hover over words and get more information).
> > >
> > > It provides a way for links to be followed from a page that were not
> > > intended to be there. If I write a page, I dont want m$ changing it.
> >
> > And how is that any different from the links available based on a page from
> > the Netscape "What's related" feature?
>
> Nothing. This is just typical knee-jerk reaction here. It's a
> Microsoft innovation, so it's automatically suspect and evil.
>
Thats right. It is from micro$oft, so it is suspect and evil. Lets see,
you see a serial killer walking down the street, and a body lying in the
street... whats your guess?
--
Rick
------------------------------
From: Frog2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 Jun 2001 01:45:35 -0000
Subject: Re: Why homosexuals are a threat to heterosexuals
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.men
sunbird ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "." wrote:
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > We have a special word for people who don't recognize danger............
>
>> Recruits?
>
> body bag filler
body bags are uncle sams' condoms.
when you see them you can be sure he's been fucking around...
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
From: Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.arch,misc.invest.stocks
Subject: Re: The beginning of the end for microsoft
Date: 08 Jun 2001 23:16:16 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas Siebert) writes:
>Maybe Y2.038K will pull me out of retirement like Y2K did for all the
>COBOL graybeards :)
I can't work out whether I count as a greybeard or not. I don't have
great growth to produce a convincing beard yet, but parts of it, if I
persevered, would definitely be grey. Perhaps being somewhat between
languages is the problem.
--
Chris Morgan <cm at mihalis.net> http://www.mihalis.net
Temp sig. - Enquire within
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis G. Allard)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: So what software is the NYSE running ?
Date: 8 Jun 2001 20:37:11 -0700
"Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<84aU6.9834$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > I'm talking about what they [the NYSE] use for managing trades.
>
> Well, their web site runs under AIX, so one would assume that they're
> probably a big IBM shop, and are probably running trades under AIX and/or
> OS/390.
If they were running anything Microsoft, they would have crashes so much
more often it would make this little down time look like a holiday!
------------------------------
From: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: More micro$oft "customer service"
Date: 8 Jun 2001 22:45:08 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nothing. This is just typical knee-jerk reaction here. It's a
> > Microsoft innovation, so it's automatically suspect and evil.
> >
>
> Thats right. It is from micro$oft, so it is suspect and evil. Lets see,
> you see a serial killer walking down the street, and a body lying in the
> street... whats your guess?
I fail to see the connection........
Dan
------------------------------
From: mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why homosexuals are a threat to heterosexuals
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 23:58:21 -0400
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> "." wrote:
> >
> > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "." wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > "." wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> > mlw wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> flatfish+++ wrote:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 19:50:05 -0400, mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > >For the record, I'm not gay, and think the idea of being with another
>man is
> > >> >> >> > >repugnant. Those are my personal feelings and it certainly is not my,
>nor
> > >> >> >> > >anyone else's, place to judge anyone based on personal feelings.
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > Wait until they try to teach "alternate lifestyles" to your children
> > >> >> >> > in school.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Fear makes a person small.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > We have a special word for people who don't recognize danger............
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Recruits?
> > >>
> > >> > Absolutely not.
> > >>
> > >> > Basic training is all about recognizing, alleviateing, and combating
> > >> > dangers of all sorts.
> > >>
> > >> Its actually all about volunteering to die
> >
> > > The purpose of military is NOT to die for one's country....
> >
> > > or, as the DI in "Full Metal Jacket" so eloquently put it:
> >
> > > " [describing a screw up] and then you'll be DEAD Marines....and then you'll
> > > REALLY be in a world of shit, because Marines don't die without permisssion."
> >
> > >> for absolutely no reason at all.
> >
> > > Do you enjoy your constitutional freedoms?
> >
> > > a) no
> > > B) YES
> >
> > > If so, thank a soldier.
> >
> > Oh and by the way, how exactly were you defending my constitutional freedom
> > in saudi arabia?
>
> Simple.
>
> Freedom to conduct business without your fuel prices being subjected to gouging
> by a Moscow-created Hitler-style dictator.
I think you should look at your history. The dictator was created by the U.S.A.
The Russians had nothing to do with his creation. He was buddy buddy with
president numb nut's dad.
------------------------------
From: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: More microsoft innovation
Date: 8 Jun 2001 22:59:07 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > And how is that any different from the links available based on a page from
> > the Netscape "What's related" feature?
>
> 1. Its a micro$oft "feature"
> 2. Please describe this "what's realted feature". I am not familiar with
> it. I rarely go to a netscape page purposely.
> 3. Benefit of doubt... even if it were the same, how would that excuce
> micro$oft?
You really need to learn something about this before you attack it.
You only look foolish here.
The "What's Related" feature has NOTHING to do with "a netscape page".
It's a feature of the Netscape 6 browser. It's sorta like the IE 6
Smart Tags, but not nearly as clean or easy to use.
You see, I know because I've actually used both. Unlike you, who
obviously have used neither IE 6 not Netscape 6. Of course, that
doesn't stop you from having opinions about either.
Trust me - once you folks understand this and see it, it will be "Why
didn't someone think of this sooner?". I see no reason why IE 6 for
the Mac - or even for OS X - could not get this great feature.
Dan
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pascal Haakmat)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: UI Importance
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 03:59:37 GMT
drsquare wrote:
>On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 19:09:48 GMT, in comp.os.linux.advocacy,
> (Woofbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, drsquare
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see how you're supposed to search for something like what you
>>> typed. I doubt typing "i[intArray]" into google would yield too many
>>> results.
>>
>>Ithink 4,240 results qualifies as "too many."
>>
>>Never underestimate Google. }: )
>
>Yeah, but I bet most of them are part of a piece of source code or
>something...
So what? If 4000 pieces of source code won't teach you the meaning of
"i[intArray]", then nothing will.
------------------------------
From: Ray Chason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Here's a switch for a change
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 04:05:58 -0000
flatfish+++ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>They plug in the system and use a display on the shelf and
>keyboard/mouse and sure enough when he boots up the entire system
>freezes with a BSOD complaining about corrupt files.
>Of course the idiot had no current back up and he said everything was
>fine until he installed the Win98me upgrade which he paid $125.00 for,
>so he said.
Assuming those are US dollars, if this guy paid $125 for the upgrade
license for WinME or Win98 then he got gypped. Most places I've
seen sell them both for $90.
I suppose $125 would be about right if they're Canadian dollars.
--
--------------===============<[ Ray Chason ]>===============--------------
PGP public key at http://www.smart.net/~rchason/pubkey.asc
Delenda est Windoze
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Porter)
Subject: Re: Linux dead on the desktop.
Reply-To: No-Spam
Date: 09 Jun 2001 04:06:20 GMT
On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 17:12:15 -0700, GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edward Rosten wrote:
>>
>> >> And it will run like a dead whale at that speed. I think you're more
>> >> likely to need a 500Mhz, which of course will require a new
>> >> motherboard. So that's what, another £200?
>> >
>> > Windows XP isn't processor intensive. My 233 mhz hovers around 6%
>> > processor usage 99.9 % of it's life.
>>
>> Good lord! My Linux box (a P133) seems to run on 0.1% to 0.5% most of the
>> time. What on earth dows XP spend 6% of the time doing?
>>
>>
>
>
> HEHEHHE.... reporting back to Microsoft headquarters keeping an eye on
> him!
>
>:-)
Windows 95 used to run the cpu at 100% when doing absolutely *nothing*
some said it was to scan the keyboard, so its nice to see MS have managed
to cut that down to < 6% :)
Here's mine.
load average: 0.15, 0.06, 0.01
--
Kind Regards from Terry
My Desktop is powered by GNU/Linux.
Free Micro burner: http://jsno.downunder.net.au/terry/
** Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **
------------------------------
From: Frog2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 Jun 2001 03:32:32 -0000
Subject: Re: double whopper with cheese a threat to heterosexuals
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,soc.support.fat-acceptance,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
aaron wrote:
> Ulysses wrote:
> > Other than the danger of bigoted, homophobic, religiously
> > fundimentalist (and a crummy form of the religion in question) nazis
> > such as post in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, what danger did you have in
> > mind?
>
>
> I never gave a shit
ahem
> about them until they started turning themselves
> into modern-day versions of Typhoid Mary.
if you don't let any of them fuck you up the ass what does it matter to
you?
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Ebert)
Subject: Re: Argh - Ballmer
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 04:49:10 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>All software developed by the U.S. Government, written in house
>>or funded and written by a contractor should be GPL'd.
>
>Dunno about going that far. There may be international issues,
>for example; also, it's far from clear that the GPL is as free
>as it should be. (It's far from clear that it isn't, either.)
>
>I'd frankly have to study the issue in some detail; since I'm not
>a lawyer, it's not clear how useful that would be. :-)
>
If you have a situation where you have some secret government
cyber coding project, you can still GPL this code and not release
it or the binaries to the public.
I don't think a regular copyright would do any more for
security of secret processes.
--
Charlie
=======
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Ebert)
Subject: Re: Here's a switch for a change
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 04:53:04 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, flatfish+++ wrote:
>
>This guy was going ballistic and putting on quite a show and when he
>started screaming about how Windows sucks and CompUSA should be sued
>for selling inferior programs and so forth someone said why don't you
>run Linux?
>
Myth #1 with MS software.
If something goes wrong I can sue somebody.
Unless you happen to be smoking a pack of cigarettes
or near second hand smoke when the computer fails,
you will probably not get any lawsuit money for
a Windows failure.
--
Charlie
=======
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Ebert)
Subject: Re: IBM Goes Gay
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 04:56:13 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>pip wrote:
>>
>> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>> >
>> > pip wrote:
>> > >
>> > > flatfish+++ wrote:
>> > > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > This thread really does have no place here.
>> >
>> > deviancy effects EVERYONE.
>>
>> Yes I know - am I am being effected by you. Case in point.
>> Can you just stick to technology at least ?
>
>sure.
>
>shove that windows shit up Bill Gates's ass.
>
Bill's ass now carries a seperate encrypted code,
thus making his ass the safest ass on the net.
>--
>Aaron R. Kulkis
>Unix Systems Engineer
>DNRC Minister of all I survey
>ICQ # 3056642
>
>L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
> can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
>
>J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
>I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
>H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
>G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
>
>F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
>E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
>D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
>C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
>B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
>A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
--
Charlie
=======
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
