On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 12:01:36AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > I think I had to change a few
> > other things as well, mincore was not defined anywhere and sys_madvise
> > was not defined either.
>
> I have no idea what sources you're using then. They're there
> in the snap I pulled off ftp.kernel.org.
>
Hmmm...I patched up from 2.3.51, I'll have to look again to see where
they went.
>
> > This is the first kernel I've used after the IRQ rewrite, but it seemed like
> > response time is a little slower when there is heavy disk activity.
> > Also, is there a reason that there is never an IRQ handled on CPU 3
> > (the last CPU)?
>
> I figured that might be the case. Andrea's last set of irq patches
> delivered an interrupt to all cpus, only one of which would eventually
> handle it. The rest of them wasted time.
>
I guess that would explain why in the 'try' columns all the CPUs tried
to service the interrupts. :)
BAPper
