Jay Estabrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I don't believe we've ever actually tried it, it's just there as a > placeholder, as we *will* need it when boxes get so big (WILDFIRE) > that we can't generate physical addresses to access all the (possible) > hardware bits using 43-bit KSEG... ;-} Cool. Does 48-bit KSEG imply 64K page size like I think it does? (I need to get the 3rd edition of the ARM I guess...) That's likely to cause bigger problems than the different KSEG start address :) -- David Huggins-Daines, Senior Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. 613.562.1239 desk, 613.223.0225 mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Richard Henderson
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Richard Henderson
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patc... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patc... Richard Henderson
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Richard Henderson
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch David Huggins-Daines
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Jay Estabrook
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch David Huggins-Daines
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch David Huggins-Daines
- Re: 2.3.99-3 axp combo patch Andrea Arcangeli
