On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > static clockid_t clock_get_array_id(const clockid_t id)
> > {
> > if (id >= 0)
> > return id < MAX_CLOCKS ? id : POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID;
> >
> > if (clock_is_posix_cpu(id))
> > return POSIX_CPU_CLOCK_ID;
> >
> > return POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID;
> > }
> >
> > static inline int dispatch_clock_getres(const clockid_t id, struct timespec
> > *ts)
> > {
> > struct k_clock *clk = &posix_clocks[clock_get_array_id(id)];
> >
> > return clk->clock_getres ? clk->clock_getres(id, ts) : -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> I would like to take this idea one step further, like so:
>
> static struct k_clock *clockid_to_kclock(const clockid_t id)
> {
> if (id >= 0)
> return id < MAX_CLOCKS ?
> &posix_clocks[id] : &posix_clocks[POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID];
> ...
> }
>
> SYSCALL( ... , const clockid_t id, struct timespec *ts)
> {
> struct k_clock *clk = clockid_to_kclock(id);
>
> return clk->clock_getres ? clk->clock_getres(id, ts) : -EINVAL;
> }
>
> What do you think?
Yeah, that's even better!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
