From: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 00:25:55 +0200
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 09:16:24AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > Regardless of how we implement it, the way I read POSIX, it does > > require at least msync(x, 4096, MS_SYNC|MS_INVALIDATE) before > > accessing the data in another way. > > Right. At least the version of fsx-linux in akpm's ext3-tools > tarball doesn't do that. I don't think we can seriously consider this requirement. We can make the data properly coherent on D-cache aliasing cpus, so we should. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
