From: Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:44:11 +0200

> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:31:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> > On munmap we do a flush_cache_range for the unmapped vmas ... we
> > have to, otherwise the data might be lost as the user mapping is
> > zapped and we wouldn't be able to guarantee coherency writing it
> > to the backing store.
> 
> As far as I understand it, the munmap() does flush out the copy of
> the data at the user virtual address, but the subsequent read() call
> reads from an address in the kernel direct mapped window, for which
> there is still data in the cache due to the earlier read() syscall,
> and the mapping_writably_mapped() test fails so we don't end up
> calling flush_dcache_page().

That is what is happening for sure.

That mapping_writably_mapped() check depends upon munmap()
flush out the lines from the cache on the user side at
least enough to make them coherent on the kernel side.

As I said my flush_cache_range() on sparc64 used to do this,
but I removed it for whatever reason, perhaps I did not
consider this case back then.

I'm not advocating a full flush on flush_cache_range(), but rather to
set a page state bit, which will force a flush on the
"check_dcache_page()" call which we could replace this conditionalized
flush_dcache_page() call with.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to