>Do you mean gcc-2.95.2 or the current gcc CVS tree? IIRC, there is a
>new ARM backend in the CVS tree that contains better Thumb support, but
>I'm not sure if gcc-2.95.2 also contains Thumb support.

Both, up to a point.  The "new backend" lets you generate both ARM and Thumb 
code from a single compiler binary.  In days of yore (2.95) you had to build 
a separate compiler.  If you actually want to start using Thumb the former 
would be a better bet.

p.



_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm

Reply via email to