>Do you mean gcc-2.95.2 or the current gcc CVS tree? IIRC, there is a
>new ARM backend in the CVS tree that contains better Thumb support, but
>I'm not sure if gcc-2.95.2 also contains Thumb support.
Both, up to a point. The "new backend" lets you generate both ARM and Thumb
code from a single compiler binary. In days of yore (2.95) you had to build
a separate compiler. If you actually want to start using Thumb the former
would be a better bet.
p.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm