I agree, the intel site is wrong on how to set the prefix
when making glibc. I had the same problem with the compiler
but it went away when I set --prefix=/usr/local/arm/arm-linux
(/usr/ocal/arm is where I put all the arm cross development
stuff)....
>>The only real difference between what I've done and what's on the Intel
>>site as far as GNU packages is that I'm using EGCS 1.1.2 and the
>>apropriate ARM patch from Phil. B as opposed to EGCS 1.1.1 and a patch.
>
>You should probably consider using gcc 2.95.1 now.
>
>>I followed Intel's directoy conventions to the letter (I changed nothing).
>
>I think Intel's instructions are wrong; this has been discussed here
recently.
>See the mailing list archives.
>
>>If I wanted the output "console" (Linux login, etc) to appear on the LCD
>>would I have to write the LCD driver or is there something I can use to
>>get basic text on the screen? Anything for the keyboard IC (USAR
>>SPICoder)?
>
>I think there is a Brutus framebuffer driver now. Nico can probably give a
>more definite answer.
>
>p.
>
>
>unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
