On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 21:15 +0100, Esben Stien wrote: > "alex stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > we just want to avoid somebody to directly make money with our work, > > that is by selling our software in a sampler product like a sampler > > + sample library bundle, a hardware sampler or something equivalent, > > at least not without giving something back to the open source > > Community."
I don't quite see what would stop a company from bundling LS with commercial content, stating that LS is included as a freebie. > But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the > free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither > the free software definition nor the open source definition. The really funny thing would be the authors going MIA and nobody being there to give that permission that at least commercial distros might think is required. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
