On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:42 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 19:05:49 schrieb Thorsten Wilms: > > I don't quite see what would stop a company from bundling LS with > > commercial content, stating that LS is included as a freebie. > > It's simple: as soon as it's bundled with commercial content, say on a medium > they want money for, LS would be part of a commercial product, thus exactly > what the exception prohibits.
It's simple: That is why LS is neither Open Source or Free Software * Claiming otherwise is intentionally misleading deception. Complaining about it (again...) is just a stupid waste of time. We know all of this already. Move on, list, move on. ;) -DR- (* Some reasonable people care, some reasonable people don't, BFD) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
