Chris Cannam <can...@all-day-breakfast.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <ne...@arnaudov.name> wrote: >> Chris Cannam <can...@all-day-breakfast.com> writes: >>> OK... That sounds rather hazardous to me. To lose all of one's data >>> instead of saving it, after a potentially long session's work, because >>> of a check box incorrectly checked when starting the application, >>> surely wouldn't please many users? >> >> And you are suggesting what? > > Uh, I think you've lost me a bit, Nedko. What do I appear to be suggesting?
Mmmm, suggesting as proposing > I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session > manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to > save. Especially if that decision is based on user input that > happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work > since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake). What better alternative you propose? ladish will implement levels 2 and 3 in future. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
pgpQmR6P8JASF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
