Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > rosea grammostola <rosea.grammost...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session >>>> manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to >>>> save. Especially if that decision is based on user input that >>>> happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work >>>> since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake). >>>> >>>> >>> What better alternative you propose? ladish will implement levels 2 and >>> 3 in future. >>> >>> >>> >> I understand the concern of Chris. All though I didn't make the mistake >> yet when working with Ladish. >> >> Isn't it possible to popup some kind of warning message "you've chosen >> level 1, but this is not supported by this app" >> Or another solution which helps the user not making this fault? >> > > If ladish knows whether level 1 is really supporeted it wouldnt be > needed for user to specify it. Such warning message will be possible > when app (.desktop files) list is implemented. But i'd rather disallow > user to override the level from the UI, instead user can change the > .desktop file or override it with another one in the user specific > filesystem location. > > It looked to me as an advantage of Ladish that I, as a user, was able to choose on which level I want to use the application. As I see it now, I would like to keep that possibility.
\r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev