Excerpts from Adrian Knoth's message of 2010-04-16 11:21:12 +0200: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:06:28PM +0900, michael noble wrote: > > > hi folks, > > Hi! > > > Are any interested or invested parties willing to provide some clarification > > on this? I know distros are fully welcome to package whatever they wish. I > > also am pretty sure that whatever happens will happen regardless of my > > opinion on the matter. There have, however, been some colorful exchanges > > between packagers and devs regarding JACK in the past so in the interest of > > transparency and openness I was hoping involved parties might have something > > to say about this. > > Here's a good summary: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-April/134723.html > > > By now, Debian, Ubuntu and OpenSuse are already in, Fedora is still > undecided. > > So yes, it's true, I've asked all the major distributions to switch to > jackd2, so users have the same feature set no matter which distro they > use. > > Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to > jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1 > instead. > > > > HTH
May I ask for the reasoning behind this? Personally I don't see jack2 as a successor to jack1. Regards, Philipp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev