On 17 April 2010 04:33, Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote: > Clearly, we can't dispose of that. But to what extent should the > future development path of JACK be determined by the limitations of > packaging systems? > > Does anyone really want to have to choose between JACK1 and JACK2 (and > tschak? perhaps) on a permanent basis? Does anyone want to step up and > make the hard decision about NetJACK1 or NetJACK2? Can that decision > even *be* made? Is that supposed to be my job?
Man, am I glad to see that response. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
