On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:10:35 -0400 Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Ralf Mardorf > <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > > @ nonsense and bullshit, where are the examples that it works? > > > > There is no valid recording with more than 1 or 2 channels, regarding to > > a natural impression. Some art projects that didn't try to give a > > natural impression are something very, very different. > > > > Most audio engineers still fail regarding to stereo and mono issues. I > > wonder about the geniuses who are able to do 5.1 and all the other > > stuff. > > > > Please post links to the geniuses work, but call me names. > > ralf, you simply don't have any idea what you're talking about, unless > you try to limit your comments to commercially released material. you > made no indication that you intended to use this limitation. > > people have been recording with/for ambisonics for nearly 40 years > now. recording with multiple microphones (including things like the > eigenmike > http://www.mhacoustics.com/mh_acoustics/Eigenmike_microphone_array.html > which by itself makes your point null and void) is common enough that > sound on sound has articles on it. I remember when 2001 first came out, being totally astonished by the sequence where the ape-man first uses a bone as a club. There was the totally realistic effect of a gust of wind moving from the screen to the rear of the cinema. I've no idea what system was in use, but it certainly wasn't 2 channel stereo! -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
