On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:40 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > > > > There are some good mixes for stereo and mono, but at least I never > > > heard a valid mix with more but one ore two channels. > > > > I've been to Jörn Nettingsmeier's workshop at LAC2010 and that was 3D > > allright. And the good thing was, the complete recording and mixing was > > done with Linux. > > It was 2D Ambisonics actually, using 8 speakers. 3D (with height) > is yet another experience. >
It doesn't matter. I was wrong about my general (mis)judgement about surround. This doesn't mean that I'm fine with Ambisonics. I don't know it until now, because I didn't tested it, but for sure I was mistaken, because my experiences regarding to surround are outdated, resp. Ambisonics itself is as old as I'm, but less known. I try not to be more royalist than the king. As I mentioned before, even for '2D' IMO = stereo, I don't use the given abilities, because I tend to do stereo mixes compatible to mono. I'm not fine with 5.1 (or what ever the equivalent for movies is called) when watching a Hollywood movies. Somebody did mention that it even isn't 5.1 what I don't like, but the usage of 5.1. IMO more enlightenment is needed. I'm completely outdated, other people might confuse '3D' with '2D'. IMO the current possibilities are less known. ;) Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev