On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 18:03 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:40 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > > > > > > There are some good mixes for stereo and mono, but at least I never > > > > heard a valid mix with more but one ore two channels. > > > > > > I've been to Jörn Nettingsmeier's workshop at LAC2010 and that was 3D > > > allright. And the good thing was, the complete recording and mixing was > > > done with Linux. > > > > It was 2D Ambisonics actually, using 8 speakers. 3D (with height) > > is yet another experience. > > > > It doesn't matter. I was wrong about my general (mis)judgement about > surround. This doesn't mean that I'm fine with Ambisonics. I don't know > it until now, because I didn't tested it, but for sure I was mistaken, > because my experiences regarding to surround are outdated, resp. > Ambisonics itself is as old as I'm, but less known. > > I try not to be more royalist than the king. > > As I mentioned before, even for '2D' IMO = stereo,
PS: Using the dummy head effects for headphones = left + right + ahead + behind ... without headphones stereo is more limited ;). I guess overhead and bottom is another very special issue. > I don't use the given > abilities, because I tend to do stereo mixes compatible to mono. > > I'm not fine with 5.1 (or what ever the equivalent for movies is called) > when watching a Hollywood movies. Somebody did mention that it even > isn't 5.1 what I don't like, but the usage of 5.1. > > IMO more enlightenment is needed. > > I'm completely outdated, other people might confuse '3D' with '2D'. > > IMO the current possibilities are less known. > > ;) > > Ralf > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev