On 13 April 2011 22:03, Tim E. Real <termt...@rogers.com> wrote: > I agree that if this new port were to be sandwiched among the others > or if he were removing ports, that's breakage.
I think that was the plan, though -- to put the new port after the other control ports and before any of the existing audio ones. And that's the problem. I like to disagree with David on most things LADSPA -- for example I think a host that uses the "unique" ID at all is broken from the outset, because there's no way to ensure that ID is actually unique, e.g. for plugin wrappers. But in this case, and even though my own hosts should cope with Tim's change without problems, I have to agree that the change is not a good idea. Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
