On 17 April 2011 18:12, David Robillard <d...@drobilla.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:59 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: >> I like to disagree with David on most things LADSPA -- for example I >> think a host that uses the "unique" ID at all is broken from the >> outset > > Well, that's just silly... it's the only ID there is. What else would > they use?
Library name plus label, for example. My hosts do that and have done for years. Not ideal either of course, but at least it doesn't completely stuff up any situation where a numerical ID can't be generated in advance (dssi-vst, etc). Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
