On 1/7/2013 4:28 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 14:20 +0100, Ove Karlsen wrote:
The Beneficient Open-Source licence:
http://paradoxuncreated.com/Blog/wordpress/?p=6198
This "license" is incredibly ambiguous and inadequate, so much so that
calling it "open source" is a bit of a stretch.
If you want to actually have your code be useful to people, use an
existing established (e.g. OSI/FSF certified) license so that people can
actually use it in projects without worry. Vanity licenses are just a
pain for everybody; using them is the opposite of beneficent.
Copyright licenses are not the place for statements of intent,
hand-wavey language, and appeals "common sense". Put that stuff
elsewhere and use a license that actually does the job of a licence.
-dr
I think you are incredibly retarded, and like R.S. sits in code all day,
and doesn´t understand that the world has moved on, and things can be
expressed in very simple terms, and believers around the world will
fully comprehend.
We don´t need your obscurity. And when people understand religion, and
that they have been fed lies about Islam, and that is ultimately
supports their own nature, to infinite extent, and indeed represents
freedom, in ways incomprehensible to fools like
R.S. who plays thought-police, and wants his obscure slogans and FSF
foundation, to obscure the progress and natural development of man, and
that includes open-source, you and your like will be gone, like all
retarded idolaterous society of all times.
A relic like pharao is what you are. And your code just as obscure.
Peace Be With You.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
