On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Michael Bechard <gothma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> Inconsistent support for VST/VSTi plugins. > > > Paul Davis has already pointed out that this can mean two > > different things. If someone's workflow *really* depends on > > native Windows plugins - repeat *if* repeat *really* - then > > why on earth should such a person want to use Linux ? > > As regards 'native Linux' VST, I don't see the point of it. > > I'll counter your question with another one; regardless of a user's > workflow, why *wouldn't* we, as LAD's, want to enable as many different > kinds of plugins to work on Linux as possible? From a user's perspective, > having more choice is just better, and there are *tons* of quality DSP > tools out there in the VST format; there's absolutely no down side. > the down side is that you will be running *Windows* plugins on Linux. this could be great, then hassle-filled, then non-functional, then great again depending on the plugins, the state of wine and the precise tools you are using. is that "just better" for the user?
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
