On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 22:42 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote: > On 02/06/2013 10:24 PM, David Robillard wrote: > > ... We all complain > > sometimes, but people who do nothing but complain are nothing but toxic. > > > > I hope this thread didn't go that way, but I'm sure as hell not going to > > read it to find out ;) > > So far so good, I'm happy to report. I have a lot to read and consider.
Good to hear. As an almost entirely infrastructure level person this sort of thing is firmly in the toxic "actively try to avoid" bucket, but I'm sure there's more value to it at the user level. > And as always, thanks for your work on LV2, I'm a fan. LV2 sucks! ;) ... but it sucks much less than it used to. If in this process you end up compiling a list of unmet requirements with respect to plugin APIs, please send them the way of lv2-dev, or the lv2plug.in tracker, or myself, and they'll be addressed soon enough. Since 1.0.0 most things are actually quite simple to add, but currently progress is exclusively driven on a "hacker with an itch" basis, which tends to be dramatically more esoteric than common user basic use cases. Because of that and other reasons, I think a high level roadmap is important, and am trying to establish one at http://lv2plug.in/roadmap to make it clear where we were, are, and are going, and what needs doing to get there. I really don't have the time these days to invent new problems for myself by guessing (poorly) what others might care about (or be on IRC all day, or read these tedious threads), but I do have time to occasionally spend a few hours plowing through the tracker and fixing what's there. Filing tickets, then, is a very easy way to ensure your needs are met. Conversely, no ticket => no care. Cheers, -dr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
