>please read the subject line! >it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only. >it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in >general nor NSM in particular.
Then let me rephrase: Why should NSM not be hosted under jackaudio, since it is the session manager for JACK programs? The response to that was "because NSM is technically independent of JACK" and my answer was in the previous mail. Nils _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
