On 4/4/21 11:06 PM, Nils Hilbricht wrote:
please read the subject line!
it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in
general nor NSM in particular.
Then let me rephrase:
Why should NSM not be hosted under jackaudio, since it is the session manager
for JACK programs?
The response to that was "because NSM is technically independent of JACK" and
my answer was in the previous mail.
allow me to kindly rephrase you:
... NSM ... is the *recommended* _session management_ for JACK programs!
(note the distinction between "management" and "manager")
and yes, I totally concur to that "NSM is technically independent of JACK".
the thing that makes NSM so "JACK-friendly" is only about one separate
utility/client program called "jackpatch"... nothing else technically
relates NSM to JACK and vice-versa.
regards
--
rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rncbc.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
