On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:52:53 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > Right. I've mentioned that you're really meant to deal only with the > current block, and thus, we're *not* talking about low rates of > changes. (BTW, AudioUnits also does it this way, if I understand it > correctly. You have to keep telling the receiving control about the > ramp for each block.)
Is that what we're doing, retelling the pliugin about the current ramps? I'm, not sure if that is helpful or not. Agian, I;d have to try it to find out. > It seems to me that we should do like everyone else: Linear ramps > only. Dead simple (well, almost), well defined and *very* much better > than no ramps at all. Yeah, and thier easy to ingore ;) - Steve