On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11.50, Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:40:15 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > ONe great thing about this scheme is that it encourages people > > > not to think of certain, arbitary parameters as instantiation > > > parameters, withc are special in some way, 'cos there not. > > > > The way I've seen velocity-mapped samplers is not to change the > > sample later - you get the sample that maps to the initial > > velocity, and further changes are just volume/filter > > manipulation. > > Ny if you map CC1 (say) to a map then changing that will change the > sample, its just that, in MIDI, velocity cant change after the > voice has started.
Right. But the synth can still latch CC1 only on NoteOn - and in that case, you have to send CC1 *before* the NoteOn you want it to affect. However, note that CC1 is a channel control, and thus doesn't have the problem of "what if there's no voice allocated to trace the controls!?" //David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate .- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------. | Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. | | RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. | `---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -' --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---