On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:40:15 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > ONe great thing about this scheme is that it encourages people not to > > > think of certain, arbitary parameters as instantiation parameters, withc > > > are special in some way, 'cos there not. > > > > The way I've seen velocity-mapped samplers is not to change the sample later > > - you get the sample that maps to the initial velocity, and further changes > > are just volume/filter manipulation. > > Ny if you map CC1 (say) to a map then changing that will change the > sample, its just that, in MIDI, velocity cant change after the voice has > started. > Not quite right, _I guess_ that in some synths you can change velocity of a note after it has started by sending polyphonic aftertouch messages. At least, you can use polyphinc aftertouch messages for that purpose. --