On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:32, Juhana Sadeharju wrote: > For some reason the shared memory is not a true shared memory. > The shmserver and shmclient do have the shared memory segment > obtained with the same shmid value, but processes seems to > have their own duplicates of it. I have no other explanation.
I haven't got any problems with shared memory, but afterall, I don't use the SystemV method (shm* functions) because it sucks. I think the SystemV IPC stuff sucks as whole. I like to use the "real" POSIX way.. :) -- Jussi Laako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
