On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:42, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyway if the author does not object, I would be willing to spearhead a > > drive to get this into the kernel. I am sure they will approve as soon > > as 100s linux audio users voice their approval... > > It's fine with me. I agree that it makes sense, but have not been > willing to hassle with the LKML, myself. Several others have > suggested it in the past, but no one was willing to push it through > the process. > > If you do that, I'll help. I have a version in my CVS working tree > that will build as a kernel patch with the appropriate Kconfig and > Makefile updates. Please copy me on any messages you send to the > LKML, I'm not subscribed. > > Torben was the original author, and I've been developing and > maintaining it since the end of 2003. I doubt he will object, but he > can speak for himself. :-) > > Adding it to the kernel sources would probably make maintenance > easier.
OK, I am removing LAU from the cc's, as this is now a technical discussion rather than an opinion poll. ;-) Are there any known issues with the code that the kernel guys might bring up? Seems like it has been stable for a while. The only thing I notices was that the indentation doesn't follow the recommended kernel style. I found your original RFC post to the LSM mailing list, I was thinking of including a pointer to that, as everything in there still seems to apply. Also, I assume you are not referring to sourceforge CVS, because I looked and there aren't any Kconfig patches. Can you commit this to SF CVS so I can check it out? Anyway let me know when you have a patch you are comfortable submitting for inclusion in the kernel and I will go ahead and post it. Lee