On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 18:20 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > I suppose to make everyone happy this should be runtime configurable. > > Incorporating which would be quite a task :) > > no, to make everyone happy we need the High Res Timer patch. that avoids > the stupidity of a fixed HZ, which is so early '90s that its > embarrassing.
Yeah, that point is universally acknowledged. The question is what to do until that patch is ready to merge. Lee
