[Alfons Adriaensen] >Interesting. So again I'm inclined to think that the reported problem is >due to denormals. > >I usually do a very blunt ... + 1e-20 at strategic places. So far, nobody >has complained about the DC offset :-)
Similar approach works fine here, too (flipping the sign of the addition constant at every sample or every block, depending on the algorithm in question). Inaudible (in fact barely measurable), code is branchless and simple. Perfect solution for a stupid little problem. Cheers, Tim
